Natural
History
Notes
on the Birds
Songbirds Two
Shrike through Gnatcatcher
|
About the
categories
|
|
|
Name
|
Common name
|
|
Food
|
The main food category.
|
|
Feeding Techniques
|
How it acquires its food.
|
|
Habitat
|
What kind of area does the bird
live?
|
|
Plumage
|
Is there similarity between the male
and the female, between winter and spring, young and adult,
or are there variations in the plumage amongst the species.
|
|
Distribution
|
Approximately where it is found in the
United States.
|
|
Breeding
|
Unique aspects on how the species
breeds.
|
|
About the Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Special notes on the status or natural
history of this bird.
|
|
Notes from A. C.
Bent
|
Selections from the Life Histories of
North American Birds, edited by
A. C. Bent.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
small mammals, reptiles, and birds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Hunts from a perch; scientific name
refers to their habit of hanging the food that they catch on
a thorn as a butcher hangs meat.
|
|
Habitat
|
Open brushy field; edge
habitat
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout most of the US; scarce in
the northeast
|
|
Breeding
|
Nest is built in a shrub or small
tree.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Linnaeus, who is mentioned below, was
a Swedish naturalist who developed the binomial naming of
animal and plant species. He lived between 1707 and 1778.
For more information about him go to Carl
Linnaeus
French mockingbird is a name that was
given to the Loggerhead Shrike in the area around
Charleston, South Carolina.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Among the earliest ornithological
memories of the writer is the search for nests of the
"French mockingbird" amid the myrtle bushes of the back
beach of Sullivans Island, near Charleston, S. C. On this
narrow barrier of sea sand, which has figured so largely in
history since the days when Sir Peter Parker's fleet was
turned away by the batteries of palmetto-logged Fort
Moultrie, many Low Country bird records have helped make
ornithological fame locally. It was a happy hunting ground
for several kindred spirits of schoolboy days, and birds'
eggs were mediums of exchange for various and sundry other
specimens of beach and marsh. In few other areas since has
the writer ever found the loggerhead shrike such a
characteristic bird and will always associate it with this
spot for it was among the first half dozen species of his
"life list." Though having shown it to many others for their
"first" since, long acquaintance with it has not dimmed
interest in its attractive way of life.
Misunderstood and rather frowned upon
by the uninformed, the loggerhead is one of the decidedly
beneficial and valuable birds of its range and its
activities are a natural asset of no mean proportions. As
its name implies, it was described from Louisiana, by
Linnaeus, but the bird is no more typical of that State than
many other parts of its habitat.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
small mammals, reptiles, and birds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Hunts from a perch; scientific name
refers to their habit of hanging the food that they catch on
a thorn as a butcher hangs meat.
|
|
Habitat
|
Open brushy field; edge
habitat
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Northern part of the country.
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Food: Dr. Sylvester D. Judd (1898)
writes of the food of the northern shrike: "During its
winter sojourn it renders a threefold service by killing
grasshoppers, English sparrows, and mice. The birds and mice
together amount to 60 percent, and insects to 40 percent, of
the food from October to April. Grasshoppers constitute
one-fourth of the food, and are equal to twice the combined
amounts of beetles and caterpillars. * * * In the stomachs
of the 67 butcherbirds examined 28 species of seed-eating
birds were found. Of these 3 were tree sparrows, 5 juncos,
and 7 English sparrows; the others could not be determined
with certainty."
In the early days of the English
sparrow in this country, while they were being protected,
northern shrikes became so abundant on Boston Common that
men were employed to shoot them, lest they destroy the
sparrows. In this connection, Dr. Judd remarks: "It is to be
hoped that in other cities this enemy of the sparrow will be
protected instead of persecuted. If there were 6
butcherbirds in each of 20 New England cities, and each
butcherbird killed 1 sparrow a day for the three winter
months, the result would be a removal of 10,800 sparrows.
Since two sparrows could raise under favorable conditions
four broods of 5 each, the increase would be tenfold, so
that those destroyed by the butcherbirds, if allowed to
live, would have amounted at the end of the first year to
118,800, and at the end of the second year to 1,306,800
individuals."
In addition to the three named above,
he lists the following birds that this shrike has been known
to kill: Chickadee, snow bunting, downy woodpecker, vireo,
kinglet, field sparrow, goldfinch, siskin, myrtle warbler,
mourning dove, cardinal, longspur, and horned
lark.
Among mammals, meadow mice (Microtus)
seem to be the most frequent victims, but Judd also lists
the white-footed mouse (Peromysails) and the harvest mouse
(Reithrodontomys). He continues:
Carrion is sometimes eaten. Prof. F.
E. L. Deal, while at Ames, Iowa, In January, 1880, saw a
butcherbird fly over the brown frozen prairie to a carcass
of a cow, where it lit on one of the ribs and greedily tore
off shreds of the flesh.
Active insects are much more liable
than sluggish ones to fall victims to the butcherbird,
because objects which at rest can not he discriminated are
instantly seen when moving. Thus it happens that flying
grasshoppers and running beetles form a large proportion of
the food of this bird. Grasshoppers and crickets
(Orthoptera), which are eaten during every month from
October to April, form 24 percent of the total volume of
food, and for October and November together these Insect
pests form more than half of the food. Compared with
Orthoptera, the beetles (Coleoptera) eaten are of minor
importance, amounting to only 6 percent of the food. More
than half of these beetles belong to the family Carabidae,
the members of which prey upon insect pests. Caterpillars
were contained in one fifth of the stomachs examined, and
during the months of January and February amount to 8
percent of the volume of the stomach contents. Dr. A. K.
Fisher collected in March two stomachs that were full of
caterpillars. Even the bristly Isabella caterpillar is
eaten, an object apparently as edible as a chestnut bur.
Cutworms were found in several instances, but moths were
seldom met with. Ants, wasps, flies, and thousand legs are
sometimes eaten, and spiders constitute 3 percent of the
food; but bugs (Hemiptera) were not detected during our
laboratory investigations, though a cicada supposed to have
been impaled by a shrike was found by Mrs. Musick, at Mount
Carmel, Mo. * * * The present Investigation shows that
beneficial birds form less than one-fourth of the food of
the butcherbird. It also shows that the butcherbird, in
addition to being an enemy of mice, is a potent check on the English
sparrow, and on several insect
pests. One-fourth of its food is mice; another fourth
grasshoppers; a third fourth consists of native sparrows and
predaceous beetles and spiders, while the remainder is made
up of English sparrows and species of insects, most of which
are noxious.
The amount of insect food taken by the
northern shrike, as stated above, seems surprising. The
stomachs examined must have been taken largely in the
southern extremes of its winter range, or in fall or spring,
for the shrike would not be likely to find flying or
crawling insects in New England or in the Northern States in
the dead of winter; but grasshoppers are often available in
New England in October, and even in some Novembers, and
other insects in March.
Dr. Miller (1931) adds the following
birds to the list mentioned above, as taken by the species,
including both subspecies: Hairy
woodpecker, phoebe,
white-winged crossbill, redpoll, titmouse, bush
tit, and robin.
Charles B. Floyd (1928) adds song, white-throated,
and fox
sparrows and the starling to the list of victims and says:
Several reports are at hand of
unsuccessful attempts to capture White-breasted
Nuthatches, English
Sparrows, Downy
Woodpeckers, etc. In several
cases where a Shrike pursued Nuthatches, the latter escaped
capture by entering a hole in a tree or a nesting-box. The
Downy Woodpecker often out-maneuvered its pursuer by
constantly turning and dodging in the air rather than by
flying away in an attempt to escape by speed, as do almost
all the other small birds. Twice this winter I have
personally watched a Shrike attempt to capture a Downy
Woodpecker from above. Each time that the Shrike swooped to
strike the bird, the Downy turned quickly in the air at a
sharp angle, the Shrike overshooting its mark. It then
turned with much more effort than the woodpecker, and again
took up the pursuit. So long as they were in sight - and I
saw the Shrike swoop a number of times - the Woodpecker
continued on its way apparently unafraid, and dodged each
attack with ease.
Several observers have seen shrikes
chasing blue
jays or found one of the jays
impaled in the usual shrike fashion. Ora W. Knight (1908)
adds the pine grosbeak to the list of the shrike's victims.
William Brewster (1936) gives the following account of a
shrike in pursuit of a brown
creeper:
When I first saw him, he was in hot
pursuit of one of the Brown Creepers and both birds were
about over the middle of the river arid scarce a yard apart.
The Creeper made straight for the big elm which stands at
the eastern end of the bridge. When he reached it, the
Shrike's bill was within six inches of his tail, but he
nevertheless escaped; for an instant after the two birds
doubled around behind the trunk the Shrike rose to the
topmost spray of the elm, where he sat for a minute or more,
gazing intently downward, evidently watching for the
Creeper. The latter, no doubt, had flattened himself against
the bark after the usual practice of his kind when badly
frightened and he had the nerve and good sense to remain
perfectly still for at least ten minutes. My eyes were no
better than the Shrike's, for it was in vain that I scanned
the trunk over and over with the greatest care. Feeling
sure, however, that the Creeper was really there, I waited
patiently until at the end of the period just named he began
running up the trunk, starting at the very point where I had
seen him disappear. It was one of the prettiest
demonstrations of the effectiveness of protective coloration
that I have ever witnessed.
In the same publication, he vividly
describes the capture and killing of a field
mouse:
As I watched a Shrike it flew from the
topmost spray of a small maple into some alders and alighted
on a horizontal stem about a foot above the level of
surrounding snow but directly beneath; as I afterwards
found, the snow had thawed quite down to the ground, leaving
a trench about two feet deep by three or four inches wide,
into which the Shrike, after peering intently for a moment,
suddenly dropped with fluttering wings and wide opened
tail.
Within a second or less it reappeared,
dragging out a Field Mouse of the largest size. The moment
It got the Mouse fairly out on the level surface of the snow
it dropped it apparently to get a fresh hold (as nearly as I
could make out it had held it up to this time by about the
middle of the back). The Mouse, instead of attempting to
regain its run way, as I expected it would do, instantly
turned on its assailant and with surprising fierceness and
agility sprang directly at its head many times in
succession, actually driving it backward several feet
although the Shrike faced its attacks with admirable
steadiness and coolness and by a succession of vigorous and
well aimed blows prevented the Mouse from closing
in.
At length the Mouse seemed to lose
heart and, turning, tried to escape. This sealed its fate
for at the end of the second leap it was overtaken by the
Shrike, who caught it by the back of the neck and began to
worry it precisely as a Terrier worries a Rat, shaking it
viciously from side to side, at the same time dragging It
about over the snow which, as I could plainly see through my
glass (I was standing within ten yards of the spot) was now
freely stained with blood. I could also see the Shrike's
mandible work with a vigorous, biting motion, especially
when it stopped the shaking to rest for a moment. When It
finally let go its hold, the Mouse was evidently
dead.
After the shrike had carried off the
mouse in its claws, partly eaten it and hung it in a fork,
Mr. Brewster examined the mouse.
The Shrike had not touched any part of
the body but the skin had been torn away from the entire
neck and the muscles and other soft tissues were almost
entirely gone from the shoulders and sternum to the base of
the skull. The body was untouched and the skull showed no
signs of injury, but the cheek muscles had been eaten pretty
cleanly away as had also the entire throat with the tongue.
Both eyes were whole and in their sockets. This examination
confirmed the conviction which I formed while watching the
Shrike and Mouse struggling together, viz, that the bird
killed the Mouse partly by throttling: that is by choking
and shaking it and partly (perhaps chiefly) by cutting open
its neck on one side. No attempt was made to stun the Mouse
by striking at its skull, such blows as I saw delivered
being evidently intended merely to keep the Mouse at bay
until the Shrike could close with it and get it by the neck
as it finally did.
Mr. Brewster's close observation and
careful description shows what is perhaps the shrike's usual
method of killing rodents, and I can find very little
evidence to the contrary, but Mr. Forbush (1929) says that
John Muir "saw a shrike go down into a gopher hole and drive
out half a dozen young gophers, and hovering over one after
another as they ran, it killed them all by blows delivered
from its powerful bill on the back of each one's
head."
Dr. W. S. Strode (1889) tells the
following story of a mouse-hunting shrike:
Not long since a young farmer invited
me out to his field near town where he was husking shock
corn, to see a 'Mouse Hawk," as he called it, catch mice. On
coming to where he was at work I looked about for the Shrike
but did not see it until he pointed to a tree two hundred
yards away where it sat on the topmost twig. Pretty soon a
mouse ran from the shock, when it came almost with the
rapidity of an arrow, and seizing the mouse in its bill flew
away with It to the woods across the river, but in a short
time it was back again at Its perch on the tree where it did
not remain long until another mouse ran out from the shock.
In order to test the bird's boldness I pursued this mouse,
but undaunted it flew almost between my feet and secured it,
and apparently not liking Its hold it alighted a few rods
away and hammered the mouse on the frozen ground, and then
tossing it in the air caught it by the throat as it came
dawn. He then again flew off to the woods. This proceeding
the farmer assured me would be repeated many times in the
course of the day, and that every mouse would be carried to
the strip of woods just over the river. Subsequently a
chopper told me that be had found a honey locust tree in
this woods that had mice stuck all over it on the
thorns.
The northern shrike has two principal
methods of hunting, watchful waiting and active pursuit. The
former method is the one usually employed, as in the above
accounts, in securing mice; the bird perches patiently and
motionless on some commanding tree, post, or wire, ready to
pounce suddenly on its unsuspecting quarry; mice may be
secured also by hovering over their runways in the fields
and meadows. Grasshoppers, crickets, and other moving
insects may be taken by watching for them, hovering over the
fields, or by active pursuit on the ground, though I have
not seen the latter method mentioned. But birds must be
caught by active pursuit in the air or by chasing them
through the trees and bushes; in the latter case the birds
escape more often than they are caught by seeking the
shelter of dense growth where the shrike is less adept in
penetrating the thickets and dodging through the tangles of
branches and twigs; cedars and other dense evergreens offer
excellent havens of refuge for small birds. Small birds
easily recognize the difference between a shrike and some
other harmless bird, and immediately "freeze" in their
tracks, or seek shelter in the nearest dense
cover.
The shrike is a fairly swift flier,
but is often not able to catch a smaller bird in a
straightaway flight, especially if it resorts to dodging, at
which the heavier bird is less adept. The shrike's usual
method is to rise above its victim and dive down upon it,
felling it to the ground with a stunning blow from its
powerful beak, which often proves fatal by breaking the
little bird's neck or its back. The shrike follows it to the
ground immediately and, if necessary, kills the bird with a
blow at the base of the skull or by biting through the
vertebrae of the neck. Small birds often escape from such
attacks by mounting higher and higher in the air, so that
the shrike cannot get above them, and then suddenly darting
downward into thick cover.
Having killed its bird, the shrike
seizes it by the neck or shoulders in either its bill or its
claws, or both, and flies away with it. Mr. Floyd (1928)
made a number of inquiries on this point and received
replies from 23 observers, 13 of whom reported that the prey
is carried in the bill, I said in the claws, and 3 had seen
both bill and claws used. By some one of these methods the
bird is carried to the shrike's larder and impaled on a
thorn or a sharp stub on some tree or bush, on the barb of a
barbed-wire fence, or some other similar point; often the
bird is hung by its neck in the acute angle of a fork in a
branch or twig. Mice are hung up in the same way, to be
immediately devoured or saved for future reference. The feet
and claws of the shrike are evidently not strong enough to
hold the quarry firmly while it is being torn apart, and
some additional support is desirable; hence this
characteristic habit. If the shrike is really hungry, its
prey is gulped down almost entirely, flesh, feathers, for,
and most of the bones, only a few of the larger feathers and
bones being discarded. These indigestible portions of the
food are disgorged later in the form of pellets, which are
often found where shrikes have been feeding. Edwin A. Mason
sends me the following description of a pellet that he took
from a birdbanding trap where a shrike had been feeding on a
junco: "Including a 10-mm. tip, or tail, the pellet was 40
mm. long and 10 mm. thick, consisting largely of matted
feathers; scattered through the mass could be seen small
pieces of bone, some identifiable as from the skull, one
tarsus with foot attached, and one fragment of bone
obviously from the main body skeletal structure." A very
brief period of time had elapsed between the ingestion and
the regurgitation of the indigestible material.
Mr. Floyd (1928) mentions "several
pellets which measured from half an inch long to one and
one-eighth inches. They averaged three eighths of an inch in
diameter."
The northern shrike often kills more
mice or birds than it can use at once, to many of which it
never returns, and these are left to dry or rot. It has been
known repeatedly to enter a bird-banding trap, kill all the
birds in it, and not eat any of them. It sometimes dashes
into a flock of redpolls or goldfinches, knocking out
several of them, perhaps for the mere sport of killing them.
Mr. Floyd (1928) writes: "A shrike that was seen to enter an
electric-car barn in pursuit of an English Sparrow killed
all the Sparrows in the barn, without thought of itself or
pausing to eat any of its victims.~~ In captivity it will
eat almost any kind of raw meat, will kill living birds and
eat them, or eat dead birds or mice, though it seems to
prefer mice to any other food. It will come to a feeding
station to eat suet or hamburg steak, even when live birds
are in the vicinity. Dr. Charles W. Townsend (1933) says:
"On a warm March day I watched a Shrike fly-catching from
the top of a tree. He pursued a large bee and missed it, but
by a quick turn he caught it. * * * Once I saw two on March
9 hovering about the dry thatch-grass cast up on the beach,
apparently picking up flies and spiders." |
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous; eats what is
available
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Scavenger
|
|
Habitat
|
Found practically everywhere,
especially where humans are.
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
See A.C. Bent notes below
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
"recrudescence of the amatory
instinct" basically means the reawakening of the desire to
mate, which is being considered as some birds start singing
again in the fall, months away from their breeding season.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Courtship in birds is expressed in
three ways, namely in display, dance and song. * * * The
courtship song of the Crow consists of a rattle, a quick
succession of sharp notes which have been likened to the
gritting of teeth. That this is a courtship song and not
merely one of the bizarre expressions of this versatile
bird, is shown conclusively by its association with
courtship display and dance. Like all bird songs it is
commonest in the spring, but may occasionally, as in the
case with many bird songs, be heard at other times,
especially in the fall of the year, when it is explained by
the "autumnal recrudescence of the amatory instinct."
Although the song is generally given from a perch, it may
also he given on the wing, constituting a flight song,
although there is no other difference in the character of
the two songs.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Will sometimes eat carrion
|
|
Habitat
|
Mountainous areas
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
The western US
|
|
Breeding
|
Builds nest either on a cliff or the
top of tall tree. May use the same site for a number of
years.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
The Common Raven is a very intriguing
bird. Bent mentions their social structure below. Bernd
Heinrich is one writer who has explored this bird in two
books, Ravens in Winter and Mind of the Raven.
More information can be obtained from the USGS
page.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Behavior: The flight of the raven is
so fully described under the following subspecies that it is
hardly necessary to say anything further about it
here.
It shows great mastery of the air in
its majestic flight; it can stand almost motionless in the
teeth of a gale, hover in the air like a sparrow
hawk, or take advantage of the
upward current on a steep hillside to rise and circle like a
large hawk. Mr. Pearse tells me that when these birds were
so abundant there, there was a regular flight line night and
morning to and from their feeding grounds toward the
mountains in the interior of Vancouver Island; they always
passed over sometime before dark and would return in the
morning at a corresponding period after sunrise. They never
went by in a flock, but in small parties of eight or more,
once as many as 40. They probably had some roost in the
interior. Baird,
Brewer,
and Ridgway
(1874) mention a roost discovered by Captain Blakiston near
Fort Carlton; his "attention was first drawn to it by
noticing that about sunset all the Ravens, from all
quarters, were flying towards this point. Returning to the
fort in the evening by that quarter, he found a clump of
aspen trees, none of them more than twenty-five feet high,
filled with Ravens, who, at his approach, took wing and flew
round and round. He also noted the wonderful regularity with
which they repaired to their roosting-place in the evening
and left it again in the morning, by pairs, on their day's
hunt. They always left in the morning, within a minute or
two of the same time, earlier and earlier as the days grew
longer, on cold or cloudy mornings a little later, usually
just half an hour before sunrise"
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Opportunistic
|
|
Habitat
|
Generally found around the coastal
areas.
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Southeast, especially around the coast
and other water areas
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Behavior: The fish crow does not
differ materially in its habits from its better-known and
larger relative. Its flight is similar, but it is quicker
and more given to sailing, giving a few flaps of its wings
and then sailing along for a short distance. It often poises
in the air, hovering on rapidly beating wings, as it scans
the ground or water beneath it for possible food. When a
number of these crows are together, they often indulge in
circling maneuvers, flying around in a confusing formation
and then straightening out and proceeding on their way.
Audubon (1842) writes:
While on the St. John's river in
Florida, during the month of February, I saw flocks of
Fish-Crows, consisting of several hundred individuals,
sailing high in the air, somewhat in the manner of the Raven,
when the whole appeared paired, for I could see that,
although in such numbers, each pair moved distinctly apart.
These aerial excursions would last for hours, during the
calm of a fine morning, after which the whole would descend
toward the water, to pursue their more usual avocations in
all the sociability of their nature. When their fishing,
which lasted about half an hour, was over, they would alight
in flocks on the live oaks and other trees near the shores,
and there keep up their gabbling, pluming themselves for
hours. Once more they returned to their fishing-grounds,
where they remained until about an hour from sunset, when
they made for the interior, often proceeding thirty or forty
miles, to roost together in the trees of the loblolly
pine.
Fish crows are more sociable and more
nearly gregarious in their habits at all seasons than are
their northern relatives. They are seldom seen singly; they
often nest in small colonies or groups; and wherever there
is food to be obtained, especially in the vicinity of heron
rookeries, they are always to he found in large numbers. But
the biggest aggregations are to be found in the winter crow
roasts. M. N. Gist, the warden at the Orange Lake rookery,
estimated the winter crow population at that locality as
50,000, some of which may have been Florida crows, according
to Mr. Howell (1932), who adds: "At Goose Creek, Wakulla
County, in January, 1920, we observed long lines of Fish
Crows every morning shortly after sunrise, flying westward
along the beach from the direction of St. Marks Light.
Several residents of the neighborhood told us that the birds
roosted on beaten down tracts of rushes and drift in the
marshes along the lower course of the St. Marks River. At
Panasoffkee Lake, Crows are said to roost in large numbers
in willow bushes in the marsh at the edge of the lake. At
Lake Monroe, February 18, 1897, Worthington saw a flock of
about 2,000 Fish Crows going to roost in rushes"
At North Island, S. C., early in
December 1876, Maynard (1896) saw a great flight of fish
crows that he thought were migrating. "They were evidently
migrating for they came down the coast in an almost unbroken
stream and continued to fly all day. I think I saw more pass
the island than I ever saw before. It did not seem possible
that there could have been so many of these Crows in
existence for they could be counted by tens of thousands."
This may have been merely a local movement, for the birds
might have been seeking shelter from the hard, cold
northeast wind that was blowing at the time; and fish crows
are known to spend the winter much farther north.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Opportunistic
|
|
Habitat
|
Desert
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
In Bent the Mexican Jay is referred to
as the Arizona Jay with the scientific name of Aphelocoma
sordida. It then became known as the Gray-breasted Jay until
the current name (2004) of Mexican Jay.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
This is the northernmost race of a
Mexican species that extends its range into southern Arizona
and southwestern New Mexico.
Behavior
The Arizona Jay is one of the most
interesting birds of the family, unique in more ways than
one. It is the only one of our jays that is markedly
gregarious at all seasons, traveling about in scattered
flocks of 6 to 20 or more birds; even in the breeding season
it lives under semi-communal conditions, with mutual interest
in all the nests in the community, helping to build and
defend its neighbors' nests and young, shrieking loud
invectives at the intruder, with much bobbing of heads and
twitching of tails. All this is in marked contrast with the
solitary and secretive habits of other jays during the
breeding season. Mr. Swarth (1904) writes of its
behavior:
Noisy, fussy and quarrelsome as all
the jays are, I know of no other species which possesses to
such an eminent degree the quality of prying into all manner
of things which do not concern it, and of making such a
nuisance of itself in general, on the slightest provocation
or on none at all, as the Arizona Jay. *** A
Red-tail
or Swainson
Hawk sitting on some limb,
furnishes a little excitement until he removes to some
quieter locality; but the crowning joy of al is to find some
wretched fox or wild cat quietly ensconced on some broad,
sheltered, oak limb. In such a case the one that finds the
unhappy victim takes excitement on hand; and it is nothing
unusual to see thirty or forty birds gathered about the
object of their aversion, letting him know in no undecided
terms just what their opinion of him is. It is a curious
sight also to see a dozen or more gathered around some large
snake, which they seem to fear nearly as much as they hate.
On one occasion I had an excellent opportunity of watching
about twenty Arizona Jays protesting at the presence of
rather a large rattlesnake which was leisurely travelling
down a dry watercourse which passed our camp. The jays
seemed imbued with a wholesome fear of their wicked looking
antagonist, and though they surrounded it, kept at
respectful distance; they were not as noisy as they often
are, but kept uttering low querulous cries, quite different
from their usual outbursts. Some of the boldest lit a short
distance from the snake and strutted before it in a most
curious fashion, head and body held bolt upright, and the
tail pressed down on the ground until about a third of it
was dragging. *** Besides his vocal outbursts, the Arizona
Jay makes when flying a curious fluttering noise with his
wings, loud and distinct enough to be heard some little
distance producing a curious effect; especially when, as
often happens, a troop of them comes swooping down some
steep hill side to the bottom of the canyon. Though wary and
cunning to a marked degree, so that it is usually impossible
to get within gun shot of them, still their curiosity leads
to their destruction; for it is a simple matter for the
collector, by hiding behind a bush and making any squeaking
or hissing noise, to get all the specimens desired.
Bendire (1895) says: Their flight
appears to me far less laborious than that of the
California
Jay. It reminds me of that of
some of our Raptores, rising now high in the air, partly
closing their wings, and then darting suddenly down, then up
again, and repeating these movements for some time.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Opportunistic
|
|
Habitat
|
Chaparral; oak forest
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Southwestern US - California to West
Texas
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
There are many accounts of
interactions with the members of the Corvidae family of
birds. The Corvidae family includes jays, crows, ravens,
mapgies, and nutcrackers. All of these species demonstrate
aspects of intelligence and a willingness to engage with
humans.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
This jay seems to have a sense of
humor or a fondness for play. Joseph Mailliard (1904) gives
an amusing account of the behavior of California jays with
his cats, stealing their food and teasing them. While a jay
is attempting to steal food from a cat, "each has the
measure of the other, and while a cat is watching, it is
rarely that a jay approaches within reach of its business
end, though it will do all it can to make the cat jump at
it, or at least turn away. Grimalkin has learned to keep her
tail well curled up when feeding, as a favorite trick of the
jay is to give a vigorous peck at any extended tail and,
when the cat turns to retaliate, to jump for the prize and
make off with shrieks of exultation. To find a cat napping,
with its tail partially extended is absolute joy to one of
these birds, which will approach cautiously from the rear,
cock its head on one side and eye that tail until it can no
longer resist the temptation, and, finally after hopping
about a few times most carefully and noiselessly, Mr. (or
Mrs.) Jay will give the poor tail a vicious peck and then
fly, screeching with joy, to the nearest bush"
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Scavenger
|
|
Habitat
|
Brushy woods
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
In the US it is only found in the very
south tip of Texas
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Throughout Bent's life histories there
is the constant concern towards the loss of habitat. He and
his fellow writers are aware that the land is being rapidly
carved up. Most of these writings were done more than 60
years ago.
Texas Kingfisher is a former name for
the Green
Kingfisher.
Derby Flycatcher is a former name for
Great
Kiskadee.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
This brilliantly colored jay brings to
that favored region of the lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas
a touch of tropical color that adds much to the many thrills
one feels as he meets for the first time the many new forms
of Mexican bird life to be found only in that unique
region.
As I sat on a log near the edge of a
stream in a dense forest along one of the resacas
near Brownsville, I caught my first glimpse of a green jay,
a flash of green, yellow, and blue, as it flitted through
the thick underbrush and the trees above me. In spite of its
brilliant colors it was surprisingly inconspicuous among the
lights and shades of the thick foliage. I had just been
admiring the dainty little Texas
kingfisher that flew down the
stream and perched on a fallen snag, had been lulled almost
to sleep by the constant cooing of the many whitewinged
doves, and awakened again by
the loud calls of the gaudy Derby
flycatcher. The curious
chachalaca
and the red-billed pigeon had their nests in the vicinity,
and there were a host of other interesting birds all about
me, but the green jay was the gem of the forest.
I am wondering how much longer this
bird paradise will last, for I have read that huge tractors
have been uprooting the forest trees, clearing up the
chaparral, and plowing up the rich land to make room for the
rapidly growing citrus orchards and other expanding
agricultural interests. Thus will soon disappear the only
chance we have of preserving on United States soil this
unique fauna and flora; and all these interesting birds will
have to retreat across the Mexican border, leaving our fauna
that much poorer.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Scavenger; forages in trees and on the
ground
|
|
Habitat
|
Coniferous forest habitat
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Western US
|
|
Breeding
|
Builds large nest in a tree
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Alfred M. Bailey (1927)
writes:
They are robbers of the first order,
and steal anything edible about camp. I do not know whether
we are able to give birds credit for a sense of humor, but
if we do, then the Jays surely must come in for first place.
I have watched a pair of these fellows tease a spaniel. They
would alight in a path, only to be chased away by the dog,
and they kept returning so often as to completely exhaust
him; then, when the dog refused to chase them longer, they
would alight over his head and talk to him,: undoubtedly
they were cursing him, until he finally got up and walked
away. The same performance was carried on daily. This
species is not particularly in favor among hunters, for when
one is quietly crossing a muskeg
in the hope of jumping a deer, it is the usual thing to have
a couple of Jays open a serenade, and then keep just ahead
of the hunter, talking all the time.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
See below; has a wide choice of food
items
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
|
|
Habitat
|
Scrub area
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Central Florida
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Food: The Florida jay maintains the
family tradition for a rather wide choice of food, deserving
the term omnivorous, but leaning toward selections of animal
matter to an extent of somewhat more than 60 percent, The
tendency of this bird to become familiar with humanity and
accept its offerings leads to the inclusion of many items
that would not otherwise appear, notably such food as bread,
cake, and peanuts, which are invariably accepted with
apparent avidity. Any such food, however, is highly
artificial in nature and should not enter strictly into any
summary of normal consumption. So strongly has the bird
become entrenched in many parts of its range as a
semi-domestic species that these items are mentioned because
of their frequent offering and equally accepted
status.
Dr. Clarence Cottam, of the U. S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, has kindly furnished me with a
detailed account of the stomach findings of 16 specimens of
coerulescens taken in January, March, April, May, and
September. The conclusions from this study reveal that the
food is: "Animal matter 60.63 percent. plant matter 39.37
percent. gravel 6.38 percent, trace of feathers." The
breakdown of the above is worthy of note. Though the exact
percentages are not given, the findings include the remains
of grasshoppers, locusts, crickets, termites, burrower-bugs,
squash bugs, leafhoppers, earwigs, beetles, weevils,
butterflies, moths, caterpillars, cutworms, bees, wasps,
ants, anglewings, flies, millipeds, and centipedes. Also
included were spiders, scorpions, ticks, mites, mollusks,
snails, turtles, frogs, and lizards. Vegetable matter was
represented by wheat (Triticum), crowfoot grass
(Dactyloctenium aegyptium), acorns (Quercus), purslane
(Portulaca), milkwort (Polygala), huckleberry (Gaylussacia),
blueberry, cranberry (Vaccinium), and fogfruit (Lip pia).
Portions of vegetable debris and indeterminate matter
(mast?) and wood pulp were also present.
Audubon (1842) states that the seeds
of the saw palmetto are a favorite food, so much so, indeed,
that "no sooner have the seeds of that plant become black,
or fully ripe, than the Florida jay makes them almost its
sole food for a time." lie adds that the method of feeding
is like that of the blue jay, for coerulescens "secures its
food between its feet, and breaks it into pieces before
swallowing it, particularly the acorns of the live oak, and
the snails which it picks up among the sword palmetto."
Nuttall (1832) also gives the seeds of the saw palmetto as
being eaten "largely"
Bendire (1895) adds another item in
his summary of the food as "offal." He also mentions wood
ticks specifically, as does Maynard (1896), the latter
stating that "upon examining the contents of its stomach,
found that it was filled with ticks or jiggers which infest
the skin of all quadrupeds in this section of Florida."
These references to ticks substantiate, without saying so,
of course, the observations of N. B. Moore on the habit of
this jay of alighting on the backs of cattle and securing
ticks in that manner. "Jigger" is the universal name of the
redbug in the southeast, an even worst pest than tics in
many ways.
Another food habit of this jay, not
hitherto mentioned and something of an indictment against
the bird, is its fondness for the eggs and young of other
birds, and even of poultry. Just how much this is indulged
in does not seem clear, but there is certainly abundant
evidence that predation of the sort occurs. Bendire (1895)
states that this jay is "charged with being very
destructive" in this way. A writer whose name I am unable to
determine, but whose initials are C. S. C., writing in the
Chicago Field, says that they "eat and drink with poultry,
having an eye on eggs and young chickens." M. M. Green
(1889) states: "Stomachs of two shot contained insect food.
The birds' bills were smeared with yolk of eggs. Several
people told me that the jays were nest robbers." Nuttall
(1832) notes that it "destroys the eggs and young of small
birds, despatching the latter by repeated blows on the
head"
Grimes (MS.) says: "I know they like
crickets for I saw a male pass up four, one after the other,
to his sitting mate. * * * In the fall and winter they feed
to a large extent on the little acorns of Chapman's
oak"
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Scavenger; forages in trees and on the
ground
|
|
Habitat
|
City parks, suburbia, parks
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Eastern United States
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Nesting: Bendire
(1895), in his excellent account of the blue jay, says: "It
prefers mixed woods to live in, especially oak and beech
woods, but for nesting sites dense coniferous thickets are
generally preferred; oaks, elms, hickories, and various
fruit trees, thorn bushes, and shrubbery overrun with vines
are also used, the nests being placed in various situations,
sometimes in a crotch or close to the main trunk, or on the
extremity of a horizontal limb, among the outer branches.
They are placed at distances from the ground varying from 5
to 50 feet, but usually below 20 feet. * * * I believe but
one brood is usually reared in a season, but in the South
they may occasionally raise two"
Describing typical nests, he says:
"The nests are generally well hidden, and are rather bulky
but compactly built structures, averaging from 7 to 8 inches
in outer diameter by 4 to 4 1/2 inches in depth; the inner
cup measures about 3 to 4 inches in diameter by 2 inches in
depth. Outwardly they are composed of small twigs (thorny
ones being preferred), bark, moss, lichens, paper, rags,
strings, wool, leaves, and dry grasses, the various
materials being well incorporated and sometimes cemented
together with mud, but not always; the lining is usually
composed exclusively of fine rootlets. Occasionally the Blue
Jay will take the nest of another species by
force"
John R. Cruttenden writes to Mr. Bent
from Illinois: "A peculiar habit of this bird is to line its
nest with a piece of cloth or waste paper. This is true in
the majority of nests placed near dwellings or in the city,
undoubtedly because of the more abundant supply of materials
in the city, although the habit is not unusual in nests
situated away from man. Henry Mousley (1916) reports:
"Evidently the Blue Jay betakes itself to very secluded
spots during the breeding season, as I have only succeeded
so far in finding one nest, in May of the present year
(1915), and had never seen the bird before during the months
of June, July and August." Mr. Mousley is speaking here of
his experience in Hatley, Quebec. Farther to the south, in
New England and the Middle Atlantic States, however, the jay
commonly breeds in thickly settled regions, often near
houses, as the following observations show.
Frederic H. Kennard (1898) writes: "We
have a pair of Blue Jays (Cyanocitta cristata) in
Brookline, Mass., that have this year built their nest in a
most conspicuous place, between the stems of a Wistaria vine
and the capitol of a pillar, supporting a piazza roof. This
piazza is in almost daily use, and the path leading
immediately beside it is also used constantly." Charles R.
Stockard (1905), writing of Mississippi, says: "With the
exception of the English Sparrow the Blue Jay is probably
the most abundant bird in the State. The shade trees
bordering the streets of towns, the groves near dwelling
houses, trees along road sides, orchards, pastures, and pine
woods as well as thick woods, are nesting localities of this
bird. One nest was placed in a tree crotch not more than six
feet from a bed-room window, thus one might look out on the
bird as she sat calmly upon her eggs, and later she was not
noticeably nervous while feeding her nestlings before an
audience of several persons who observed the performance
from the window"
I remember some years ago seeing a
nest containing eggs in a situation with no concealment
whatever: on the cross-beam of an electric-light pole. The
pole stood near a flight of steps used continually by
pedestrians in crossing over the tracks at the main railroad
station in Lexington, Mass. From the steps I might have
touched the sitting bird with an umbrella. Needless to say,
the nest was soon knocked down, presumably by
boys.
On June 12, 1942, in Tiverton, R. I.,
Roland C. Clement showed us a most unusual blue jay's nest
under the overhang of a cutbank beside a woodland road,
which held at that time a brood of nearly fledged young. As
he did not get a chance to photograph it, he has sent us the
following description of it: "The recessed face of the
cutbank in which the nest is placed lies only 10 feet from
the farm road, the cut itself being about 6 feet high and
its concavity amounting to about 10 inches two feet below
the overhanging brink. In this sheltered recess two stout
oak roots of 1 inch diameter reach out horizontally into
space, intersecting past their exerted centers, and in this
crotch our adaptable jays have firmly anchored an otherwise
typical nest. The nest is thus about 4 feet from the ground
below and, though not absolutely secure from molestation by
terrestrial predators which could probably clamber up to it
without undue difficulty because of the moderate incline of
the bank, it is indeed inconspicuous among the pendant roots
and rootlets of the vegetation above, which presently
consists merely of shrubs such as Corylus and
Myrica.
"The nest itself is well and firmly
woven of long, pliant dead twigs of various species,
including some spiny stems of Smilcix and a few cuims of
coarse grass, as well as a long strip of paper; and it is
lined with fine rootlets, probably those of the brake fern
(Pteris), which abounds nearby. The nest cavity is 4 1/2
inches long, parallel to the bank, and 4 inches
wide"
Mrs. Harriet Carpenter Thayer (1901)
watched the family life of a pair of blue jays at a nest at
close range and states that the male aided in making the
nest and that both birds incubated, "each relieving the
other at more or less regular intervals. And the bird at
play did not forget its imprisoned mate, but returned now
and then with a choice bit of food, which was delivered with
various little demonstrations of sympathy and
affection"
Jays are very quiet about their nest.
I knew of a nest near the center of the city of Cambridge,
Mass., and if I had not happened to see the nest, I should
not have suspected that jays were breeding near.
Bendire (1895) quotes W. E. Loucks, of
Peoria, Ill., as saying: "A nest of a pair of
Robins,
built in an elm tree, was stolen and appropriated by a pair
of these birds. It was fitted up to suit their needs, and
eggs were deposited in it before the eyes of the angry
Robins"
A. D. Dubois sent the following note
to Mr. Bent: "While listening to the Memorial Day exercises
in the auditorium at Chautauqua Grounds (a large pavilion
with open sides) I noticed a jay which flew in from the side
and up to a nest in one of the roof trusses, where it fed
its young and flew out again. This is the first jay's nest I
have ever found in a building of any kind"
Dr. Samuel S. Dickey (MS.) reports
that nests found by him have been in the following trees: 20
in white pines, 18 in hemlocks, 2 in red spruces, 2 in
intermediate firs, 12 in white oaks, 5 in alders (Alnus
incano and rugosa), and one each in a pitch pine, sour gum,
Cassin's viburnum (only 3 1/2 feet from the ground), and
flowering dogwood.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Scavenger; forages in trees and on the
ground . See below.
|
|
Habitat
|
Coniferous forest
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Primarily in the northwest, but also
found in coniferous forest going into New Mexico
|
|
Breeding
|
Nest is built by both sexes and placed
close to the trunk of a tree.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Formerly known as the Canada Jay (See
below in Bent)
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Behavior: The most striking and
characteristic traits of the Canada jay are its tameness or
boldness, one could almost call it stupidity, and its
thieving propensities. Its tameness often makes it an
interesting and a welcome companion in the lonesome woods,
but its boldness, coupled with its thieving habits, has
caused many travelers to regard it as a nuisance. Manly
Hardy expressed it very well when he wrote to
Major
Bendire
(1895)
They are the boldest of all our birds,
except the Chickadee, and in cool impudence far surpass all
others. They will enter tents, and often alight on the bow
of a canoe where the paddle at every stroke comes within 18
inches of them. I know of nothing which can be eaten that
they will not take, and I had one steal all my candles,
pulling them out endwise one by one from a piece of birch
bark they were rolled in, and another pecked a large hole in
a cake of castile soap. A duck which I had picked and laid
down for a few minutes had the entire breast eaten out by
one or more of these birds. I have seen one alight in the
middle of my canoe and peck away at the carcass of a beaver
I had skinned. They often spoil deer saddles by pecking into
them near the kidneys. They do great damage to the trappers
by stealing the bait from traps set for martens and minks
and by eating trapped game; they will spoil a marten in a
short time. They will sit quietly and see you build a log
trap and bait it, and then, almost before our back is
turned, you hear their hateful "ca-ca-ca" as they glide down
and peer into it.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Scavenger
|
|
Habitat
|
Mountainous coniferous
forest
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Western US; See below in
Bent
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
The scientific name of the Clark's
Nutcracker (in 2001) is Nucifraga columbiana which is
different from the scientific name that Wilson used, Corvus
columbianus. This demonstrates that ornithologists realized
that the Clark's Nutcracker is not a member of the genus of
crows, Corvus.
This is one of the species that is
named after Lewis and Clark who first identified
them.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Lewis's
woodpecker and Clark's
nutcracker were named for the two famous explorers who made
that historic trip to the sources of the Missouri River,
across the Rocky Mountains and down the Columbia River to
the Pacific coast, as they were responsible for the
discovery of these two unique and interesting birds. Capt.
William Clark, who was the first one to mention the
nutcracker, referred to it as "a new species of woodpecker";
and Wilson
described it as a crow, Clark's crow, Corvus columbianus.
These impressions are not to be wondered at, for its flight
and some of its actions are much like those of woodpeckers,
and it resembles the crows in much of its behavior. John T.
Zimmer (1911) remarks: "It reminded me of nothing so much as
a young Red-headed Woodpecker in that its flight was
markedly woodpeckerlike and its grayish body and head and
its black wings and tail with white on secondaries gave it,
at least superficially, a very close resemblance to the bird
mentioned." The first one I saw, while I was crossing the
Rocky Mountains in a train, reminded me very much of some
large woodpecker bounding across a valley. Its names, both
scientific and common, are all well chosen, indicating its
feeding habits, its discoverer, and the place of its
discovery.
The nutcracker is a mountain bird,
ranging from 3,000 feet up to 12,000 or even 13,000 feet,
according to latitude and season; its breeding range seems
to be mainly between 6,000 and 8,000 feet, or from the lower
limit of the coniferous forest up to timber line. It is
quite widely distributed in the mountainous regions from
southern Alaska and southwestern Alberta to northern Lower
California, Arizona, and New Mexico.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Scavenger
|
|
Habitat
|
Open country
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Western US
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Formerly called the Black-billed
Magpie. The American Magpie has been split from the
Black-billed Magpie which is now identified as living in
Europe.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Behavior: The general manner of a
magpie is that of a bird well able to take care of itself.
It is extremely suspicious yet is inquisitive to a high
degree. It takes alarm quickly and rushes away from
threatening danger, but it responds to kindness and is
easily tamed.
Much of a magpie's time is spent on
the ground in search of food. The walk is somewhat jerky,
but it has been characterized as being graceful. The tail is
slightly elevated and is constantly twitched. When the bird
is in a hurry the ordinary walk is sometimes varied to a
series of hops. Small droves of magpies were watched by
Fisher (1902) as they caught grasshoppers every morning in a
field near Mono Lake, Calif. Their agility in dodging and
circling showed how mistaken persons are likely to be in
forming an estimate of a bird under ordinary conditions.
"Usually nonchalant and absurdly dignified in their
demeanor, these birds could at times assume the utmost
interest in their occupation, and dart with surprising speed
here and there"
Bendire's
(1895) comments on flocking in this bird were that:
"Although more or less quarrelsome, it is social in
disposition and likes to be in the company of its kind. I
have frequently seen from twelve to thirty feeding together
near a slaughterhouse or some other locality where food was
abundant; but such gatherings are oftener met with in late
fall and winter than during the season of
reproduction"
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Omnivorous
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Scavenger
|
|
Habitat
|
Open country
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Central valley of
California
|
|
Breeding
|
Both sexes build domed nest of twigs
high up on a tree limb.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Bent's discussion is another good
example of the difficulty that we have always had on
deciding what a species is and is not. When is a species a
sub-species, and when is it a species by itself?
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
California contains within its borders
the whole range of the yellow billed magpie. Localities
occupied are known with exhaustive detail. They are
restricted to that part of the State west of the Sierra
Nevada from Shasta County, at the north end of the
Sacramento Valley, southward to Ventura and Kern Counties,
and are chiefly in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys
and the coastal valleys south of San Francisco. The area
occupied is less than 150 miles wide and extends for about
500 miles from north to south.
The yellow-billed magpie is obviously
a close relative of the black billed magpie. Some persons
like to think of this relationship as subspecific; others
consider the two kinds as distinct species. Probably it
makes little difference which way we think of them so long
as we recognize the nature of the characters and ranges of
the birds, insofar as they represent the true relationship,
for it is scarcely possible to prove the correctness of
either opinion. The most nearly obvious distinctions have to
do with the possession of the yellow pigment, which shows in
the bill, claws, and some places in the skin of the
yellow-billed form, and its generally smaller size. Some
differences in habits also may be seen on close study of the
two birds. The ranges do not overlap; in fact, the gap
separating them is about 50 miles wide at its narrowest
place.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Foraging along the ground
|
|
Habitat
|
Open country
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Bent touches on part of the nature of
flocking. There sometimes seems to be a collective
consciousness amongst the birds in the flock:"Their flight
is light and easy, with a somewhat undulating motion; and
the flocks are rather loose and irregular, yet they are
apparently all in touch with each other and guided by a
common impulse. "
Gregarious means having an affinity to
being with others of the same kind. Various species are
social and various species are not, and there are species
that are social in particular seasons.
Sibilant - producing a hissing sound.
One species that specializes in
getting Horned Larks to leave the ground and fly into the
air is the Prairie
Falcon which preys on Horned
Larks in particular.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Behavior: As we see them in winter
northern horned larks are decidedly gregarious, occurring in
flocks that range in size from half a dozen to a hundred or
more birds; they are seldom seen singly or in pairs as in
their summer haunts. As we walk across some flat salt marsh
near the shore, or some bare stubblefield farther inland, we
may be surprised to see a flock of these birds arise from
the ground, where their quiet movements and concealing
coloration had rendered them almost invisible. They rise all
together, and we hear their faint sibilant twittering as
they circle about, now high in the air in scattered
formation, now close to the ground in more compact order,
showing a bright glimmer of white breasts as they wheel away
from us, then suddenly disappearing from our view against
the dark background as they turn their backs toward us, and
finally vanishing entirely as they all alight on the ground
not far from where they started. Their flight is light and
easy, with a somewhat undulating motion; and the flocks are
rather loose and irregular, yet they are apparently all in
touch with each other and guided by a common impulse. As
they alight on the ground they scatter out and walk about
rapidly on their short legs, taking rather long steps, as
shown by the marks of the long hind claw in the soft mud or
sand. Horned larks are essentially ground birds; I have
never seen one alight in a tree, and, so far as I know, no
one else has. The top of a rock, stone wall, or low stump,
not over 3 or 4 feet above ground, is about as high as they
care to perch, and that not very often. They prefer open
ground, especially bare ground or where the grass is short,
and they are almost never seen where the vegetation grows
rank and high. Among the stubble or tufts of short grass,
they walk or run in a crouching attitude, reminding one more
of mice than of birds; often they squat and hide until too
closely approached. They are not particularly shy, if
carefully approached, and seem to feel aware of their
ability to conceal themselves in scanty cover. If we remain
motionless while the bird is hiding, it will soon lift its
head and look about, but at the slightest movement on our
part it squats again or runs or flies away.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Gathers insects
while flying.
|
|
Habitat
|
Agricultural areas, parks, usually
found near water
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Builds nest under eaves, under
bridges, etc.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
This is a precise description of
modern ecological considerations. Bent recognizes the
contribution that the Barn Swallow makes to our life both in
its charm and in its great ability to catch "troublesome
insects." But he wonders if modern farming will shut out the
Barn Swallow and thus lose its charm and lose a natural way
of keeping control of the insects. Is it possible to do the
job of the Barn Swallow ourselves?
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Everybody who notices birds at all
knows, admires, and loves the graceful, friendly barn
swallow. No bird in North America is better known as a
welcome companion and a useful friend to the farmer, as it
comes each spring to fly in and out of the wide-open barn
door, delighting him with its cheerful twittering, or
courses about the barnyard in pursuit of the troublesome
insects that annoy both man and beast. The peaceful beauty
of the rural scene would lose much of its charm without this
delightful feature. But such a charming rural scene is not
so common as it used to be. The old-fashioned barn, with its
wide-open doors, never closed, its lofty haymow, and the
open sheds where the farm wagons stood are being replaced by
modern structures, neatly painted buildings, with tightly
closed doors and no open windows through which the birds can
enter. Horses are replaced to a large extent by automobiles
and tractors cattle are housed in modern dairy barns; and
the open haymow is disappearing. There is no room for the
swallow in modern farming. Must it return to its primitive
style of nesting or will other means of encouraging it to
nest in our farmyards be employed? The birds will stay with
us if we supply them with supports for their nests; a
two-by-four joist, rough and not planed, nailed to the
outside of a building, flat wide side against the wall, and
placed well up under the eaves with about 5 inches of
clearance, will accomplish the desired results.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Gathers insects
while flying.
|
|
Habitat
|
Usually found near bodies of water.
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Breeds in cavities from natural to
human made bird houses.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Young: Austin and Low (1932)
from a study of a large number of nests "found the length of
the [incubation] period, estimated from the day the
last egg was laid to the day the first one hatched, to vary
from a minimum of 13 days to a maximum of 16." According to
their records the young birds remained in the nest 16 to 24
days, and to account for this variation they point out "that
the most food per young will be delivered in those nests
containing the fewest nestlings, and hence the rate of
growth will be slowest where the broods are largest." They
state that "at no time were the young birds observed to
return to the boxes once they had flown." Winton Weydemeyer
(1934b), however, says: "For a few days after taking to the
air, the young birds enter and leave the houses frequently,
and remain in them all night."
The nestling tree swallow is an
attractive little bird when, well grown, it comes to the
doorway and peers about, watching for its parents to come
through the air with food. As it waits at the entrance its
low forehead and immaculate throat call to mind a little
frog sitting there in the box. Its eyes shine eagerly, and
when the parents come near it stretches out toward them, its
throat gleaming white against the dark interior.
A. Dawes DuBois (MS.) says: "The young
are strong of wing when they leave the nest." He speaks of
one young bird which "took to the air like a veteran, both
parents accompanying it." Austin and Low (1932) state that
"usually they showed remarkable ability on their first
flight, often remaining in the air well over a minute, and
flying a quarter of a mile."George Nelson tells me that he
has often watched the young birds leave the boxes in his
garden. They launch out, then fall, fluttering, nearly to
the ground sometimes, when, of a sudden, the power of flight
comes to them, and they rise into the air and fly off,
seemingly as ably as their parents.
Behavior: As we watch swallows
in flight we notice that they do not all fly in the same
fashion, and after long watching we become able to tell them
apart when they are far away, or at least to suspect which
is which. For example, perhaps the most distinctive in its
manner of flying is the barn
swallow. It is characteristic
of this species to drive along through the air, seemingly
with a strong push.
At the end of each stroke, the tips of
the wings are brought backward until the primaries are
nearly parallel with the long axis of the body. A
robin
also shows this peculiarity but to a less degree. The bird
swings to the right and left, to be sure, but there are
periods of straight flying or sailing, and always there is
the impression of a steady drive through the air, with a
good deal of power for so small a bird.
The tree swallow, compared with the
barn swallow, appears to be less steady in the air, although
doubtless it possesses complete mastery over it. There is a
suggestion of flickering in its flight, due perhaps to the
quicker, less forceful motions of its wings. Flying at a
distance, it sometimes resembles a starling - another
quick-moving bird - but most characteristic is the habit of
hunching up its back or seeming to do so, and lowering its
wing tips as it sails, like an inverted saucer in the sky.
Francis Allen (MS.) speaks of their flight as "largely a
succession of reaches and runs with periods between them
when the bird seems to hang in stays for a while to speak in
nautical terms."
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Gathers insects while flying.
|
|
Habitat
|
Usually near water
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Builds mud nests; see
below.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Since this section was written by John
James Audubon (1837 - 1921) over 170 years ago, there is
some vocabulary that needs explaining.
assiduity - unflagging
effort
tenements - homes
requisite - necessary
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
The details of mud gathering and nest
building are described by Audubon
(1831):
About daybreak they flew down to the
shore of the river, one hundred yards distant, for the muddy
sand of which their nests were constructed, and worked with
great assiduity, until near the middle of the day, as if
aware that the heat of the sun was necessary to dry and
harden their moist tenements. They then ceased from labor
for a few hours, amused themselves by performing aerial
evolutions, courted and caressed their mates with much
affection, and snapped at flies and other insects on the
wing. They often examined their nests to see if they were
sufficiently dry, and as soon as they appeared to have
acquired the requisite firmness, they renewed their labors.
Until the females began to sit, they all roosted in the
hollow limbs of the Sycamores growing on the bank of the
Licking River, but when incubation commenced, the males
alone resorted to the trees. A second party arrived, and
were so hard pressed for time, that they betook themselves
to the holes in the wall, where bricks had been left out for
the scaffolding. These they fitted with projecting necks,
similar to those of the complete nests of the
others.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Gathers insects while flying.
|
|
Habitat
|
Usually found near a body of fresh
water
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Western US; see below
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in cavities
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
This beautiful swallow is well named;
the soft velvety plumage in subtle hues of violet and green
on the upper surface, the conspicuous white patches on the
sides of the rump, and the pure white lower surface combine
to make a charming whole, a dainty feathered gem. It enjoys
a wide distribution west of the Great Plains and from Alaska
to Mexico, and in some places it is one of the most abundant
species. A. E. Shirling (1935) writes: "The violet-green
Swallow * * * is to the Colorado mountains what
the
English Sparrow is to eastern
and central states. It is the most common bird about
cottages and towns. In respect to relative abundance, it
exceeds the English Sparrow for the sparrow's range is
confined to human surroundings of houses, barns, and picnic
grounds. The violet-green Swallow, while most abundant in
the neighborhood of human dwellings, ranges widely up the
mountain slopes and unfrequented forest lands."
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Gathers insects while flying.
|
|
Habitat
|
Usually near a water
habitat
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in cavities
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Food: Howell (1924) says: "The food of
the rough-winged swallow consists principally of insects,
with a few spiders. Flies composed nearly one-third (32.89
per cent) of the total. Ants and other Hymenoptera
are extensively eaten, and
bugs to a lesser extent. Beetles amounted to nearly 15 per
cent of the food and included the cotton-boll weevil,
alfalfa weevil, rice weevils and flea beetles. A few moths,
caterpillars, dragonflies, Mayflies, and an occasional
grasshopper make up the remainder of this bird's
food."
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Catches insects while
flying
|
|
Habitat
|
Variety of habitats; usually near
water
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in burrows in bank
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
The smallest swallow found in the
US
The scientific name of this swallow is
Riparia riparia which Bent provides an explanation
for.
The European Bank Swallow that Bent
refers to is now (2005) called the Sand Martin and still has
the scientific name of Riparia riparia which is the
scientific name of the Bank Swallow.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
The name swallow immediately brings to
our mind a bird with a peculiar charm and grace and
possessing a dexterity of flight that is seldom excelled by
birds of other groups. The swallows are insectivorous and
most of the insects are winged types that are captured
during the course of their flying. All the species share
these qualities, which serve as a strong bond of comradship
among the members of the family. Especially is this true
during autumn, when the individuals flock together at the
common roosting places and late share with each other the
vicissitudes of the long migration.
The bank swallow is distinguished from
the other swallows by its unique habit of nesting in
burrows, which it cleverly excavates well into the vertical
sides of a bank of clay, sand, or gravel. This
characteristic habit has given origin to both its scientifc
name Riparia (Latin riparia, riparian; ripa, bank of
stream) refers to its living in a bank of a stream. Likewise
the common names are obviously suggestive of this mode of
life. The name bank swallow is the one generally accepted in
this country, but others, such as sand swallow, ground
swallow, bank martin, and sand martin, also suggest the
characteristic nesting habit of this swallow.
The 1931 A.O.U. Check-list does not
recognize a subspecific difference between the American bank
swallow and the bank swallow of Europe. Oberholser (1938),
however, points out that "the American bank swallow differs
from the European Bank Swallow, Riparia riparia
riparia, in shorter wing, relatively larger feet and
bill, darker and more sooty (less rufescent) brown
underparts. ... It was long ago distinguished from the
European bird by Leonhard Stejneger, but his diagnosis has
subsequently been overlooked or ignored, although the
American bird, is however readily separable as above
indicated. Stejneger named the 'American variety' of bank
swallow Clivicola riparia maximiliani; and his type,
subsequently designated, is an adult male, No. 8325 of the
United States National Museum collection, taken at Ipswich,
Mass., May 20, 1870, by C. J. Maynard." Oberholser,
therefore, proposes the name Riparia riparia
maximiliani (Stejneger) for Riparia riparia riparia
of the 1931 A.O.U. Check-list. Whether or not the
proposal to differentiate, subspecifically, the American and
European representatives of the bank swallow is accepted by
the A.O.U. Committee on Nomenclature, it seems advisable to
limit the present account to the bank swallow in America.
Wetmore (1939) does not agree with Oberholser that
there is a line of demarcation between the American and
European birds.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Feeds from the wing
|
|
Habitat
|
Parks, suburbs,
|
|
Plumage
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Breeds in natural tree cavities, or
human made nest sites.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Food: The whole diet of the purple
martin can be fully covered by one word: insects! When that
is said, all is said, for that is what the bird subsists
upon and nothing else. However, since the same can be said
for other birds, some elaboration is necessary in regard to
specific kinds of insects. Prof. F. E. L. Beal made an
exhaustive study of the martin's food (1918) and found only
a few spiders besides true insects. These creatures are so
close to insects, however, that, in many minds, they are
identical. The Hymenoptera composed the greatest item,
amounting to 23 percent, ants and wasps figuring mostly,
with a few bees. To accusations that martins destroy
honeybees, he had a definite answer that in only 5 out of
200 stomachs did honeybees appear, and every one of them was
a drone.
Flies amount to 16 percent of the
total food and include some of the house-fly family as well
as numerous long-legged tipulids.
The Hemiptera, or bugs, amounted to 15 percent and included
stink bugs, treehoppers, and negro
bugs. Beetles composed 12
percent and are represented by May, ground, dung,
cotton-boll, and clover weevil beetles. Moths and
butterflies were found to some extent. Dragonflies seem
general favorites and were found in 65 stomachs, some of
which contained nothing else.
In connection with this habit of
eating dragonflies, Forbush (1929) states that "adult
dragonflies are considered to be useful, as they destroy
harmful smaller insects, including mosquitoes, but the young
of dragonflies are destructive to small fishes, and this
habit may neutralize the beneficial habits of these insects.
As Martins are said to feed heavily at times on mosquitoes,
their destruction of dragonflies may be
immaterial."
He says further that "in some
instances a great decrease of mosquitoes is said to have
followed the establishment of Martin colonies, but I have
had no opportunity to investigate these reports." Certainly,
it would be logical to suppose that the area about a
thriving martin colony would be freer of mosquitoes than one
without these birds. T. S. Roberts (1932), after listing
such insect prey as ants, wasps, daddy-long-legs, horse
flies and robber flies (which prey on honeybees), bugs,
beetles, moths, dragonflies, and spiders, ends with the
somewhat remarkable statement that the martin is "rather
neutral from an economical standpoint but worthy of
protection." He appears to be in an isolated position among
most writers, who are entirely commendatory of the martin's
economic value. Junius Henderson (1927) quotes some
interesting data from Attwater in saying that a quart of
wing covers of cucumber beetles were found in one martin
nesting-box. Henderson says rather vividly, in comparison
with Roberts' opinion above, that since "Martins are very
active, requiring a large amount of food, and a considerable
part of each insect is indigestible, the number of insects
they destroy in order to get sufficient nourishment is 'not
only beyond calculation, but almost beyond comprehension.'
The food is often compressed into a hard mass, so it is
wonderful how much a stomach may contain. The mass of
insects contained in a Swallow or Martin, would before
compression, equal or exceed the bulk of the bird's
body."
Audubon (1840) says little of the
martin's food, mentioning only that "large beetles" figure
in it, and that the birds "seldom seize the honey-bee."
Alexander Wilson (1831) devotes more space to this phase and
states that he "never met with more than one man who
disliked the martins, and would not permit them to settle
near his house. This was a penurious close-fisted German,
who hated them because, as he said, 'they eat his peas.' I
told him he must certainly be mistaken, as I never knew an
instance of martins eating peas; but he replied with
coolness, that he had many times seen them himself 'blaying
near the hife; and going schnip, schnap' by which I
understood that it was his bees that had been the
sufferers; and the charge could not be denied"!
Relative to the enormous numbers of
insects destroyed by this species, as well as the assiduous
care of the young in providing them with food, is the now
classic example given by Widmann (1884). He watched a colony
of 16 pairs of these birds from 4a.m. to 8 p.m, and during
that time the parents came to the young 3,277 times, or an
average of 205 times for each pair. The females made 1,823
visits, the males 1,454.
John A. Farley (1901b) records that
about the cranberry bogs of Plymouth and Barnstable, Mass.,
the martin devours numbers of the imagoes of the fireworm
(Rhopobota vacciniana), which is a highly beneficial
act, since cranberry growers estimate that over a term of
years, they lose 50 percent of their crops by insects,
chiefly the fireworm.
F. L. Farley (MS.) writes from
Camrose, Alberta, that martins are very fond of bits of
egg-shells, so much so that "they are as crazy for these
shells as are cedar waxwings for ripe fruit." He continues:
"Mrs. Farley saves most of her eggshells for one of our
friends who has about 30 pairs of martins nesting. He just
breaks them up and throws them down on the ground under his
boxes and before he reaches the house there are numbers of
martins on the ground, feeding on them and even taking bits
up to the young. The first time it was noted that martins
liked shells was when a man saw them holding on to a stucco
house and pulling away at oystershells that were protruding
from the cement. The party told me he tried to feed them
eggshells at once, and from that time on all the martin men
in town have been doing this." No doubt it was the lime that
attracted the birds. Farley adds the interesting item that
"our purple martins have increased now (1939) to more than
200 pairs in our little town, from a single pair that nested
here in 1918."
The food is, of course, procured
mostly on the wing and in the usual swallow fashion of
darting, swooping, and wheeling in erratic flight, but
graceful in the extreme. Sometimes, late in the afternoon,
or early in the morning, martins skim the surfaces of ponds
and rivers, dipping down expertly for drinks. Occasionally
they pick up food from the ground by walking about. In any
summation of the martin's food habits and economic value
Taverner's (1984) statement is eminently fitting. Under the
heading "Economic Status" he says: "The Martin like the
other swallows is a bird with no bad habits, and with so
many good ones that every effort should be made to aid its
increase." Here is no betwixt and between statement, but a
straight declaration of a fact that should be apparent to
every student of this valuable species.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
and berries
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages within brush, shrub
|
|
Habitat
|
Chaparal
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
Male and female have different calls.
|
|
Distribution
|
Found mostly along the coast of
California, but also in Oregon
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Preening is one of the most important
behaviors that birds participate in. As a photographer I
have become very aware of the time that birds spend preening
as I wait for them to be finished before I take a picture.
Sometimes it seems that birds are either preening, sleeping,
or eating.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Behavior: A wren-tit's habitat is such
that most of its movements are a series of hops or flights
of a few feet from one twig to the next. Individuals do not
cross open spaces of even 30 or 40 feet readily or
frequently. The longest flight I observed was about 150 feet
over open grassland, but such flights are
unusual.
Care of the plumage, which involves
the usual preening and bathing, has two features of special
interest. Preening is usually done by the individual's
working over the feathers with its bill, or where the bill
cannot reach, with its foot. Not infrequently, however, the
members of a pair or family preen one another. The activity
is usually limited to the region of the head but sometimes
includes the feathers of the back, sides, breast, and
crissum.
The method is always the same: the bill is thrust into the
feathers and a single one is manipulated between the
mandibles from the calamus to the tip of the vane. Bathing
in puddles when they occur near bushes includes the usual
bobbing and splashing, but the plumage is moistened by a
series of momentary dips rather than one long one. Rain - or
fog-moistened brush is perhaps a commoner source of water
for bathing. Birds move about in the leafy crowns, brushing
and bumping against the wet leaves until their plumage is
well dampened, and then the customary shaking and preening
take place. Once a bird was observed to dust-bathe.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages in trees
|
|
Habitat
|
Open woodland
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Primarily along the coast of the
Pacific states
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in cavities
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
The visitor from the Eastern States is
accustomed to seeing roving bands of chickadees, kinglets.
creepers, and other small birds trooping through the winter
woods and is not surprised when he finds just such jolly
companies of friendly little feathered mites foraging
through the dark coniferous forests of the humid Northwest
coast. The kinglets and the creepers are so much like their
eastern representatives that he does not recognize the
difference, as he sees them in life; they are just familiar
friends, kinglets and creepers. But the chickadees are
different; they do not fit into memory's picture of our New
England woods; their caps are not so black as those of
eastern birds, and the rich chestnut of their backs and
sides is strikingly new. We get the thrill of a new bird,
seen for the first time. But, as we watch them we see that
they are still chickadees, with all their manners,
activities, and cheery notes, just old familiar friends in
more richly colored garments, but just as sociable,
friendly, and intriguing; they win our affection at
once.
|
Back Home
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages in trees
|
|
Habitat
|
Variety of wooded habitats
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the northern part of the
US
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Vivacity -
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Courtship: The chickadee has
apparently developed no ritual of courtship other than the
pursuit of the female by the male: a common performance of
many of the smaller birds. Chickadees are so common and so
continually under our observation at close range that if
they practiced any marked trait when pairing off, it would
certainly have been noticed and described.
Dr. Samuel S. Dickey (MS.) says of the
mating of the chickadee: "From what I am able to learn of
this process, the birds grow agitated late in March and
increase their vivacity during April and early in May. They
hurry between aisles of trees and swerve over bypaths, and
males dart at and even clasp one another. Then they part,
and the more dominant male pursues and chases a female over
brush piles and even to the ground. Then up they arise and
hurry onward. A few such days of immoderate activity, and
their nuptial rites seem completed"
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages in trees
|
|
Habitat
|
Variety of wooded habitats
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
South-eastern United States
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
The Carolina chickadee, one of the
four birds discovered by Audubon in the coastal part of
South Carolina, is the low-country representative of the
Boreal chickadee (atricapillus); yet carolinensis by no
means confines itself to the Atlantic and Gulf coastal
plains. It ascends the Blue Ridge Mountains probably higher
than 5,000 feet, according to Brewster (1886), thus falling
short by 1,500 or 1,600 feet of attaining the highest point
in its range: Mount Mitchell, with an altitude of 6,684
feet. Brewster continues: "Common, and very generally
distributed, ranging from the lowlands to at least 5,000
feet, and probably still higher. On the Black Mountains I
found it breeding sparingly along the lower edge of the
balsam belt, and thus actually mingling with
P.
atricapillus. In one place
a male of each species was singing in the same tree, the low
plaintive tswee- dee- tswee - dee of the P. carolinensis,
contrasting sharply with the ringing te - derry of its more
northern cousin. The fact that the two occur here together
and that each preserves its characteristic notes and habits,
should forever settle all doubts as to their specific
distinctness"
Other observers have recorded the
birds in summer at altitudes of 3,300, 4,400, and 5,000
feet. But the center of abundance is unquestionably the
great swamp areas of the Coastal Plain, where the writer has
found it to be one of our commonest birds. Any wooded
territory attracts them, it seems, except possibly extensive
pine woods. But even small towns and villages often have
their chickadees, and the writer has frequently seen it as a
backyard resident.
Except during the actual breeding
period, chickadees are nearly always seen in small bands:
family parties, as it were. Late in summer and in fall they
are invariably associated with tufted titmice,
yellow-throated
and pine warblers, brown-headed nuthatches, and
downy
woodpeckers; later in the
winter their ranks are increased by myrtle warblers and the
two kinglets. In such foraging bands, the tufted tits appear
as leaders, with the chickadees as next in
command.
No bird has endeared itself to us as
much as the chickadee; its gentle, confiding ways, soft
colors, and saucy air, as well as its readiness to patronize
feed trays, render it a universal favorite.
There is evidence that our chickadees,
like other members of the titmouse family, remain mated for
periods longer than one breeding season; Nice
(1933) records a pair of Carolina chickadees in Ohio that
were associated for three winters and two
summers.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages in trees
|
|
Habitat
|
Coniferous forests usually above
4000'
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Western US
|
|
Breeding
|
Breeds in cavities
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Behavior: Grinnell,
Dixon, arid Linsdale (1930) describe in some detail the
intimidation behavior of this species when the nest is
invaded:
When a slab of rotten wood was removed
the bird lunged, at the same time spreading its wings
convulsively, and then gave a prolonged hissing sound: just
that order of procedure. The bird repeated this performance
nineteen times by count before it suddenly flew from the
nest at the close approach and light touch of the observer's
hand. The body had been kept closely depressed into the nest
cavity. The lunges were rather inane: the bird simply struck
out, in one direction and then another. At the moment of the
lunge, the black-and-white striping of the head brought her
into abrupt and conspicuous view of the observer peering
into the cavity: reinforcing the surprise effect of the
sounds produced. At times, the hissing sound was produced,
the wall of the cavity was struck, and the white of the head
moved, all at the same instant. * * * During the winter
chickadees regularly made up portions of the companies of
birds of several species that foraged together through the
day. Some of the individuals that moved to low altitudes in
winter joined circulating bands of bush-tits.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages
|
|
Habitat
|
Woodlands
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Eastern US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in cavity. Will nest in
artificial nest sites.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Food: Little seems to be known about
the food of this titmouse, and practically nothing has been
published on it. Austin Paul Smith writes: "Having but
one true Titmouse, the Black-crested (Baeolophus
atricristatus), we especially appreciate him, though he
is omnipresent, even into the heart of the city
(Brownsville). They inspect any object of any size, that may
arouse suspician of harboring caterpillars or other insects.
They are very fond of the caterpillar of the butterfly
(Libythea bachmanni) which so persistently attacks
our hackberry trees, as to have surely defoliated them this
summer, but for the combined efforts of the Titmouse and
Sennet's Oriole.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages
|
|
Habitat
|
Oak woodlands
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Southern part of Arizona and New
Mexico
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in cavity. Will nest in
artificial nest sites.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Lead colored bush tit - a subspecies
of Bush Tit
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
The oddly marked bridled titmouse,
with its sharply pointed crest, its black-and-white-striped
head, and its vivacious and friendly manners, is, to my
mind, the prettiest and the most attractive of all the
crested tits. Only those of us who have traveled in Arizona
or New Mexico, or farther south into the highlands of
Mexico, have been privileged to see it, for it is a Mexican
species that finds its northern limits in a rather
restricted area in southwestern New Mexico and southern
Arizona. We found it rather common in the oak-clad foothills
of the Huachuca Mountains, where the striking color pattern
of its pretty head gave it an air of distinction and always
attracted our admiration. We found it most commonly from the
base of the mountains, about 5,000 feet, up to about 6,000
feet. Harry S. Swarth (1904) writes: "This, one of the
characteristic birds of the mountains of Southern Arizona,
is found in the greatest abundance everywhere in the oak
regions of the Huachucas, breeding occasionally up to 7,000
feet, but most abundant below 6,000 feet. On one occasion,
late in the summer, I saw a Bridled Titmouse in a flock of
Lead-colored Bush
Tits on the divide of the
mountains at about 8,500 feet, but it is very unusual to see
the species at such an altitude"
Mrs.
Bailey (1928) says of its
haunts in New Mexico: "Small flocks of about half a dozen
each, probably families, were eagerly met with among the
blue oaks, junipers, and nut pines of San Francisco Canyon,
where they were associated with Lead-colored
Bush-Tits
and Gray Titmice. Other small flocks of the prettily marked
Bridled were later discovered in sycamores in the open
valley, at the junction of White Water Creek and San
Francisco River; but they are more characteristically birds
of the oak country"
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages in branches of
trees
|
|
Habitat
|
Oak woodlands
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Primarily California
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in cavity. Will nest in
artificial nest sites.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Formerly known as Plain Titmouse. The
scientific name is Parus inornatus, which Bent explains.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
This is, indeed, a plain titmouse,
without a trace of contrasting colors in its somber dress;
inornatus, unadorned, is also a good name for it. But it is
a charming bird, nevertheless, with its jaunty crest, like a
miniature jay, its sprightly manners, and its melodious
voice. Its gray coat blends well with the trunks and
branches of the oaks among which it forages. It is the
western counterpart of our familiar eastern tufted
titmouse, which it resembles
in appearance, behavior, and voice and for which it might
easily be mistaken, unless clearly seen.
The species, of which there are at
least nine subspecies, occupies a wide range in western
North America, from the Rocky Mountain region to the Pacific
coast, and from Oregon to Lower California. The type race is
now restricted to northern and central
California.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
65% animal items, 35% plant
material
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Gleaning
|
|
Habitat
|
Open woodland
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Eastern US
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
sagacity that is hard to fathom -
wisdom that is hard to understand.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Young: Dr. Dickey (MS.) tells me that
in several nests that he watched the period of incubation
proved to be "exactly 12 days"; and he says that young
remain in the cavity 15 or 16 days. A young bird, 4 days
old, had a light salmon-pink body, with eyes only partly
open, and was naked except for "feather tufts of dusky grey
down" on the top of the head, at the base of the skull and
in the middle of the back. When 6 days old, the "body had
blue-gray down and rows of conspicuous slate-blue
pin-feather shafts"; the eyes were now open. Two days later,
"the gray down was falling away from head and sides; the
hack mouse-gray; the flanks under back of wings tinged with
light brown; pin-feather scabbards of wings not entirely
unsheathed, but fast disintegrating." When ten days old, the
young were well feathered and closely resembled the adults,
but they remained in the nest five days more.
Mrs.
Margaret Morse Nice (1931)
writes: "In the Wichita Reserve June 6, 1926, we discovered
we had fastened our tent to a black jack in a cavity of
which five fully feathered titmice were housed; happily the,
parents accepted the situation with equanimity. I watched
the nest from 2 to 4 P.M. the first day, from 10:40 to 12:10
the next. Despite the hot weather mother Tit brooded 3 and 8
minutes the first day, 8 and 15 the next, father in the
meantime giving the food he brought to her. Both birds kept
their crests depressed, both often twitched their wings: the
female more than her mate: and both used a great variety of
notes. During the first two hours 18 meals were given,
during the last hour and a half, seven"
I cannot find it definitely so stated,
but apparently incubating and brooding devolve mainly, if
not wholly, on the female. Both sexes help to feed the young
for some time after they leave the nest, and both young and
old travel about together in a family party during summer,
until they all join the mixed parties of their own and other
species that roam the woods during fall and
winter.
Behavior: This lively little titmouse
is one of the most popular of the southern birds, with its
active, vivacious manners, as it flits about in the foliage
of the trees, often banging head downward from some terminal
cluster of leaves, or clings to the trunks and branches,
searching in the crevices of the bark for its insect food.
It attracts attention and endears itself to us with its
tame, confiding manners, as it is not at all shy, but comes
freely into our orchards and gardens, even close to houses,
and partakes of our hospitality at our feeding stations; it
appears utterly fearless of human presence. As Edmund W.
Arthur (Todd, 1940) says:
We should probably ascribe to him
without hesitation the first place in our hearts. He
presents many claims to the rank of first nobleman of the
forest realm. His presence is genial and pleasing, his
plumage attractive, his alertness conspicuous; and his
habits are good. * *
Each pair of tufted titmice has a
domain of its own during mating season. Over this the birds
exercise a jealous sway, at least in so far as errant
titmice are concerned. Enter upon this domain and without
too much fuss begin to whistle the titmouse challenge.
Directly you will excite vigorous replies from the lord of
the manor. If you persist: and you probably will: he will
approach to within a few feet of you. If you carry in your
hand a hat or a sizable piece of dark cloth or a box, his
lordship seems to think you have another bird in captivity.
He will shake himself as if with rage, or in defiance, and
drop, scolding, almost within arm's length, where as long as
you continue to answer him, he will remain to scold and
protest.
At other times, too, these inquisitive
birds show their curiosity by reacting to the sound of human
voices. Dr. Dickey tells me that they are "seen to react to
the voices and noises made by road workers, drillers, and
farmers. They hurry forward from shelter in twos or threes.
Even when a visitor calls at the door of a house and starts
to talk, then the titmouse arrives, evidently curious at a
stranger in its habitat. I sometimes hesitate to wonder if
such birds do not discriminate between the natives and
strangers, for they have a sagacity that is hard to
fathom"
Enemies: Titmice are doubtless subject
to attack by the ordinary enemies of all small birds, cats,
hawks, owls, and snakes, but published records are not
plentiful. The enterprising cowbird
finds and enters the nesting cavity to deposit its unwelcome
egg occasionally. Dr. Friedmann (1929) records four cases,
and probably others have occurred since, but sometimes the
entrance hole is too small for the parasite to
enter.
Harold S. Peters (1936) lists, as
external parasites on the tufted titmouse, two lice
(Myrsidea incerta and Philopterus sp.), a mite (Trombicula
irritans), and a tick (Hoemaphvsalis
leporis-palustris).
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Mostly insects;
some seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages in tree branches
|
|
Habitat
|
Desert
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Southwest US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nest site in shrub, low tree, or
cholla cactus. Will build nests during the year that it will
use to sleep in. See below.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Palmer Thrasher is the former name for
Curve-billed Thrasher.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
This little olive-gray bird, with a
yellow head and chestnut shoulders, is one of the
characteristic birds of the southwestern desert regions. I
made its acquaintance in a dry wash in southeastern Arizona,
where the hard stony soil supported a scanty growth of low
mesquites, hackberries, hawthorns, catclaws, and other
little thorny shrubs, with a few scattering chollas. Here it
was living in company with cactus
wrens, crissal thrashers, and
Palmer's
thrashers. Elsewhere in that
region we found it on the mesquite plains, on the greasewood
and cholla flats, and on the low hillsides dotted with
picturesque giant cactus. It and the other desert birds seem
to make a living in the harsh and cruel desert, far from any
water, where the soil is baked hard and dry and every living
plant is armed with forbidding thorns; even the "horned
toad," which is really a lizard, carries a crown of thorns
on its head and lesser spikes on its body, to protect it.
But the verdin is equal to the occasion and builds its own
armored castles, protected by a mass of thorny twigs, in
which to rear its young, and to which it can retire at
night.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Feeds along the trunk of a tree
picking for food in the crevices
|
|
Habitat
|
Coniferous forest
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have similar plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in tree cavity that they usually
excavate, or they may use an old woodpecker hole.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
gnomes -
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
The red-breasted nuthatch is a happy,
jolly little bird, surprisingly quick and agile in his
motions. He has the habit of progressing over the bark of
trees like his larger relative, the whitebreast,
but his tempo is much more rapid, and he extends his
journeys more frequently to the smaller branches. Here he
winds about the little twigs out to the end, among the pine
needles, moving very fast: up, down, and around: changing
his direction quickly and easily, seeming always in a hurry
to scramble over the branches. He is more sociable, too,
than the larger bird, and when a little company is feeding
together they keep up a cheery chatter among themselves. We
find them at their best when gathered in the northern
forests at the close of summer. Then they give their high,
tin-whistle note, kng, back and forth on all sorts of
pitches, varying its inflection, ringing unheard of changes
on this simple call, and when they are together thus, they
use also a squealing note: a very high, nasal, little pig
like or mouse like squeal: and a short explosive kick, or a
rapid series of kick. The effect of these notes, given by a
dozen birds as they chase one another about, is very jolly.
The little birds seem so happy, animated, and lively and
their voices have such a range of expression that they
almost talk: a playful gathering of talkative,
irrepressible, woodland gnomes.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Feeds along the trunk of a tree
picking for food in the crevices
|
|
Habitat
|
Oak woodlands
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have similar plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in tree cavity that they usually
excavate, or they may use an old woodpecker hole.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Spring and courtship: If we have had a
male nuthatch under our eye through the winter, either a
bird roaming through a bit of woodland or one visiting our
feeding station daily, we notice, as spring approaches, a
change in his behavior: he begins to sing freely at all
times of day, whereas previously he sang sparingly and only
in the morning hours. At this time his deportment toward his
mate changes also. All through the winter the pair has lived
not far apart, feeding within hearing of each other, but the
male has paid little attention to his mate; in fact, on the
food shelf he has shown dominance over her; but now in the
lengthening, warmer days of spring he becomes actively
engaged over her comfort. A real courtship begins: he
carries food to her and places it in her bill, he stores
bits of nut in crevices of bark for her convenience, and he
often addresses his singing directly to her. Standing back
to her, he bows slowly downward as he sings, then in the
interval before another song he straightens up, then bows as
he sings again. The songs come with perfect regularity over
and over again and can thus be recognized even in the
distance as the courtship song.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Mostly insects,
and other invertebrates with some plant food. (See
below)
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Feeds along the trunk of a tree
picking for food in the crevices
|
|
Habitat
|
Pine forests
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Scattered areas of the western
US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nests in tree cavity that they usually
excavate, or they may use an old woodpecker hole.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Food: Prof. F. E. L. Beal (1907)
examined only 31 stomachs of the California races of the
pygmy nuthatch and found the food to be divided into
approximately 83 percent animal matter and 17 percent
vegetable. The largest item of animal food was approximately
83 percent animal matter and 17 percent vegetable. The
largest item of animal food was Hymenoptera,
mostly wasps with a few ants, amounting to 38 percent of the
whole. Hemiptera came next, 23 percent; "a large proportion
of these belong to the family Cercopidae,
commonly known as spittle-insects, from the fact that they
develop inside of a froth-like substance resembling saliva
produced in summer upon grass and various plants and trees.
While none of these insects have yet become pests, there can
be no doubt that collectively they do considerable harm to
plants, as sometimes they are very abundant and subsist
entirely upon their sap." Eighteen out of twenty stomachs
from the pine woods of Pacific Grove "contained remains of
Cercopidae, and six were filled with them. The average for
the 18 stomachs is a little more than 76 percent of all the
food." Beetles of various families formed about 12 percent
of the food, caterpillars 8 percent, and spiders 1 percent.
"The vegetable portion is made up almost entirely of seeds,
of which a majority are those of conifers, as was to be
expected from the habits of the bird."
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Feeds as a group; forages over small
branches of tree looking for insects, especailly aphids.
|
|
Habitat
|
Chaparral, open woods
|
|
Plumage
|
Sexes the same except eye color - Male
has dark eye and female has yellow eye
|
|
Distribution
|
South western US going up to the state
of Washington
|
|
Breeding
|
Creates pendulous nest. See below.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Nesting: The curious and beautiful
nests of the bushtits are works of art and marvels of avian
architecture. In marked contrast to the thorny castles of
the verdins, the long, gourd-shaped, hanging pockets of the
bushtits are made of the softest materials and are often
prettily decorated or camouflaged. Some nests are more or
less concealed among the foliage or among hanging bunches of
beardlike lichens, but most of them are suspended in plain
sight, where one might easily be overlooked as a stray wisp
of lichens or an accumulation of plant debris. The nests are
hung in a variety of trees, saplings, or bushes at various
heights, although a large majority are not over 15 feet
above the ground.
Mrs. Addicott (1938) remarked that
most of the nests she studied at Palo Alto, Calif., were in
oaks, but this does not seem to be always true elsewhere.
Grinnell,
Dixon, and Linsdale (1936) have given the data for 38 nests
on Point Lobos Reserve, Calif.; the kinds of trees occupied
and the heights of the nests from the ground were as
follows: 16 nests were in Ceanothus bushes, both living and
dead, a 41/2 to 11 feet; 12 were in pines at from 6 to 50
feet, only 4 of which were above 15 feet; 4 were in live
oaks at from 7 to 20 feet; 3 were in sage bushes at from 4
to 41/2 feet; 2 were in cypresses at from 7 to 10 feet; and
1 was in a Baccharis bush at 6 feet. In the northern portion
of the range, many nests are found in conifers, spruces,
firs, and hemlocks, often suspended from the ends of limbs.
15 to 25 feet from the ground and in plain sight; but I
found two nests near Seattle that were in "spirea" bushes 9
to 10 feet up. Nests have been found in eucalyptus and
pepper trees, in willow and alder saplings, in Kuntzia and
hazel bushes, and probably in a variety of other trees and
shrubs.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
seeds
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Crawls up a tree searching the
crevices of the tree; unlike the nuthatches it never crawls
down a tree.
|
|
Habitat
|
Mature forests
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Breeds in cavities, currently three
races recognized
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
bole of a tree - the trunk of a tree
sentient - having sense perception; in
this case sentient is referring to the creeper's ability to
sense where insects are in the crevices of the
tree
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
The brown creeper, as he hitches along
the bole of a tree, looks like a fragment of detached bark
that is defying the law of gravitation by moving upward over
the trunk, and as he flies off to another tree he resembles
a little dry leaf blown about by the wind. As he climbs up
the tree, he is feeding, picking up tiny bits of food that
he finds half-hidden in the crevices of bark along his path.
In his search he does not work like the woodpeckers, those
skilled mechanics whose work requires the use of carpenter's
tools, the drill and chisel. The creeper's success depends
on painstaking scrutiny, thoroughness, and almost, it seems,
conscientiousness. Edmund Selous (1901), speaking of the
European tree-creeper, a bird close to ours in habit, uses
the exact word to show us the creeper at work. "His head,"
he says, "which is as the sentient handle to a very delicate
instrument, is moved with such science, such dentistry, that
one feels and appreciates each turn of it."
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
and fruit
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Actively forages on tree branches,
shrubs, tree trunks
|
|
Habitat
|
Variety of woody and brushy
habitats
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Southeastern US
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
In attempting to compile the life
histories of the wrens of this species, I have not
overlooked and shall not attempt to criticize a recent
important paper on the geographical variation in the
Carolina wren by George H. Lowery, Jr. (1940), in which he
splits the species into eight subspecies, one of which is
Mexican. This makes a rather large addition to the three
races now recognized in our 1931 Check-list. Doubtless some
of his races, perhaps all of them, are worthy of recognition
in nomenclature. But, as the author does not claim to be a
systematic ornithologist, it seems best for a work of this
kind to follow the nomenclature and classification of the
latest Check-list, as has been done in previous
volumes.
I have always associated the Carolina
wren with the sunny South, one of that happy trio of birds
that are always ready to greet the northern bird lover with
their loud cheery songs as he travels southward; the songs
of this wren, the tufted titmouse, and the cardinal
have enough in common to confuse a newcomer when he hears
them for the first time, but they are really different when
carefully studied; however, they are all delightful and give
us a warm touch of southern hospitality, a hearty welcome to
Dixie Land.
But we cannot now regard the Carolina
wren as exclusively a southern bird, for it seems to have
been extending its range northward during the early part of
the present century. The 1931 Check-list gave as the
probable northern limits of its range "southeastern
Nebraska, southern Iowa, Ohio, southern Pennsylvania, and
lower Hudson and Connecticut valleys" and called it "casual
or accidental in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ontario, Maine, New
Hampshire, and Massachusetts." Dr. Charles W. Townsend
(1909) has published an interesting paper on what he calls
an invasion of this wren into New England, giving a large
number of records for various States; most of these are fall
and winter records, but there are enough breeding records
mentioned to indicate that the Carolina wren may be regarded
as a rare breeding bird in at least southern New England. It
has long been known to breed on Naushon Island, off the
coast of southern Massachusetts; Forbush (1929) mentions
several other Massachusetts breeding records, and Knight
(1908) records a breeding record for Maine.
Dr. Chapman (1912) says of the haunts
of the Carolina wren: "The cozy nooks and corners about the
home of man which prove so attractive to the
House
Wren are less commonly chosen
by this bird. His wild nature more often demands the freedom
of the forests, and he shows no disposition to adapt himself
to new conditions. Undergrowths near water, fallen tree
tops, brush heaps, and rocky places in the woods where he
can dodge in and out and in a twinkling appear or disappear
like a feathered Jack-in-the-box, are the resorts he
chooses."
The last part of this statement is
undoubtedly true, but there is plenty of evidence that he
has learned "to adapt himself to new conditions." Milton P.
Skinner (1928), for example, says that, in the sandhills of
North Carolina, these wrens "are dwellers in the dooryards
and about houses, more even than in wilder haunts. Almost
all kinds of shrubbery attract them, but they like the
thickest, thorny kind the best. While they are generally in
the bushes and lower growth, they sometimes go higher into
trees, even as much as thirty feet above the ground." Arthur
H. Howell (1924) says that, in Alabama, "although partial to
low bottomland timber," it is "found also about farmyards
and in town gardens. Indeed, so domestic is it at times that
it is often called 'house wren'." Other observers give us
similar impressions and the bird certainly shows
considerable adaptability in its choice of a great variety
of nesting sites about human structures. There is no doubt,
however, that it has always shown a preference for the
wilder woodland thickets, preferably along watercourses and
in swamps, but also in hammocks and in isolated clumps of
trees and bushes on the prairies and pine barrens throughout
the South.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
and fruit
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Actively forages on tree branches,
shrubs, tree trunks
|
|
Habitat
|
Variety of woody and brushy
habitats
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Southwestern US and Pacific
states
|
|
Breeding
|
See below.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Some species adapt very well to the
presence of humans.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Nesting: Almost any suitable cavity or
place of support will suit this wren for a nesting site. Dr.
S. S. Dickey (Todd, 1940) writes: "Odd and wonderful are the
sites that Bewick's Wren habitually chooses for its summer
home. Away from the haunts of man, it selects locations
suggesting its primitive habits: knotholes in fallen trees
in the woods or open fields, natural cavities and
woodpecker-holes in trees, or now and then the center of a
dense brush heap. But civilization has provided this bird
with an unusual variety of homes. Any opening of ready
access invites its attention; among those used are holes in
fence posts, tin cans, empty barrels, discarded clothing
hung in buildings, baskets, bird boxes, deserted
automobiles, oil wells, and crevices in stone, brick, or
tile walls."
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
and fruit
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Actively forages on tree branches,
shrubs, tree trunks
|
|
Habitat
|
Brushy habitat, gardens,
parks
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage;
at least 3 races recognized
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
It is easy to imagine enemies as being
other animals that would want to eat Bewick Wrens, but Bent
reminds us that birds have a wide range of parasites
that can be very damaging.
Philopterus - is the genus of
biting louse
Liponyssus sylviarum - Northern
Fowl Mite
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Enemies: As is true with many birds,
the house wren is host to a number of external parasites.
Peters (1936) lists five species as having been found on the
house wren: Two lice, Menopon sp. and Philopterus
subflavescens (Goef.),and three species of mites,
Dermanyssus
gallinae (Deeger),
Liponyssus sylviarum (C. & F.), and Trombicula
whartoni Ewing. While the presence of lice and mites is
not usually fatal to the birds, heavy infestations are very
annoying and may prove harmful especially to the nestlings,
which have no means of ridding themselves of the
pests.
Baldwin (1922) cites a specific
example in which there was a lone house wren in a nest that
received all the food and attentions of the adult birds.
This nestling, instead of growing rapidly in size and
weight, as might be expected, was far below normal, greatly
undernourished, and a miserable skinny-looking specimen.
This condition prevailed until a heavy infestation of lice
was discovered and a poultry louse killer applied on the
twelfth day. After that there was some improvement, and a
considerable gain in weight was noted.
No records of internal parasites and
diseases of the house wren have come to my attention, but
doubtless a thorough examination of many specimens would
reveal them.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
and fruit
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Actively forages on tree branches,
shrubs, tree trunks
|
|
Habitat
|
Wet coniferous forest
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Eastern US and the
Northwest
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
The long list of insects and other
invertebrates
helps to remind us that birds like Winter Wrens are
opportunists
in their own way. They feed on what is available to them.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Food: The winter wren is almost wholly
insectivorous,
and it is especially useful in consuming many of the
woodland insects and their larvae which are more or less
injurious to our forests. W. L. MeAtee (1926a) writes:
"Vegetable food is of practically no interest to the winter
wren; the bird wants flesh and its choice of meat most
commonly strikes upon such creatures as the beetles, true
bugs, spiders, caterpillars, and ants and other small
hymenoptera.
By contrast grasshoppers, crickets, crane flies, moths,
millipeds, and snails are minor items of food, and dragon
flies, daddy-longlegs, mites, pseudoscorpions, and sowbugs
are merely tasted. Forest insects consumed are bark beetles
and other weevils, round-headed wood borers, leaf beetles,
leaf hoppers, plant lice, lace bugs, ants, sawffies, and
caterpillars."
Arthur H. Howell (1924) says that, in
the South, "the bird has been known to capture boll
weevils." And
E. H. Forbush (1929) writes:
"The winter wren feeds along the banks of streams,
frequently pecking at something in the water, and sometimes
in its eagerness to secure its prey, it immerses the whole
head. lt may thus secure water insects. Miss Mabel Wiggins
informed me that at East Marion, Long Island, N. Y., on
October 20, 1918, winter wrens were feeding on the berries
of the Virginia juniper or red cedar."
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
and fruit
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages on the ground
|
|
Habitat
|
Desert
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Western US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nest is placed in amongst boulders, in
burrows cut in banks. See below.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Nesting: Two nests that we found in
Cochise County, Ark., were built in holes in the steep,
almost perpendicular banks of a little arroyo that had been
cut out like a miniature canyon by running water. The holes
were not far from the top of the cut-bank and 4 or 5 feet
from the bottom of the cut, and were exposed by the cutting
away of the soil (pl. 54); they were probably made by
gophers or some other animal long ago, for the soil was
baked too hard for the wrens to have excavated them. The
holes were about 12 inches deep, and the nests were placed
far back; the entrance to each nest was paved with two or
three handfuls of small, flat stones, which were also found
under and behind the nest. The nests were made of grasses,
straws, weed stems, and rootlets and were lined with fine
grasses, horsehair, and a few feathers.
Mrs. Amelia S. Allen writes to me that
she found rock wrens nesting under similar circumstances
near Livermore, Calif., "in an eroded gulch 10 to 12 feet
deep. Nests were in the earthen banks of this gulch with not
a rock outcropping in sight. In Corrall Hollow itself, we
found a nest near the top of an earthen cut about 15 feet
high. It was lined with sheep's wool and contained six
eggs."
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
and fruit
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages on the ground
|
|
Habitat
|
Rocky canyons usually near an arid
habitat
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Western US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nest is placed in amongst boulders, in
burrows cut in banks.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
My trips to the desert have been
punctuated by the remarkable song of the Canyon Wren. It is
amazing that so much sound could come from such a tiny bird.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Behavior: The canyon wren is usually
heard long before it is seen. We hear the loud, ringing song
echoing from the walls of the canyon and scan the rocky
cliffs to find the tiny source of such a soul-filling
outburst of melody. We catch a glimpse of his gleaming white
throat before we can make out the outlines of the bird, for
the browns of body, wings, and tail blend well into the
background of rocks. At first, as he creeps along some
narrow ledge or dodges in and out among the loose rocks and
crevices of the cliff, we may mistake him for a chipmunk or
a white-throated mouse, so mouse like are his movements.
Soon he stops in full view on some sharp prominence or even
the crest of the cliff, throws back his head, his silvery
throat swells, and out pours the delicious strain; and we
are astonished to connect such a volume of sound with such a
tiny bird.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
and fruit
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages on the ground
|
|
Habitat
|
Desert
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Extreme southwest
|
|
Breeding
|
See below
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Z. lycioides is an old scientific name
for Coyote Bush
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Nesting: The list of nesting sites
utilized by cactus wrens is a long one. Following a study of
a large number of nests near the base of the Santa Rita
Mountains south of Tucson, Ariz., Mrs. Bailey
(1922) wrote:
While the name Cactus Wren was
justified in this locality as in others by the innumerable
nests found in cholla cactus, here thorny trees and bushes
especially catsclaw zizyphus (Z. lycioides) or
coyote
bush, were also used
extensively, while mesquite and the dense shrubby hackberry
or grenjeno were used occasionally for nesting sites. It was
interesting to note that zizyphus bushes containing nests
generally stood under mesquite trees, so getting double
protection. The protection afforded by the armament of
thorns was often so complete that it was impossible to reach
a nest without cutting away the obstructing branches. Even
that, however, did not always satisfy the nest makers, for
such bulky, conspicuous nests need to be safeguarded in
every way from hawks, owls, and other enemies. Thirty-five
out of sixty-four nests examined were not only protected by
the entangling thorns of the surrounding branches but were
built within clusters of the red-flowered mistletoe which in
many cases partially or wholly concealed them. One nest lay
on a level branch covered by an unusual horizontal growth of
mistletoe and showed only as a darkened mass inside, but
most of them were in round ball-like masses of mistletoe,
commonly at the ends of branches in terminal mistletoe
rosettes, frequently so dense that it was impossible to
obtain nest statistics or photographs. One of the nests
without mistletoe protection was built under an
unbrella-like mass of foliage.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
and fruit
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages on ground, near edge of water;
sometimes takes insects from surface of water.
|
|
Habitat
|
Marsh
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nest in built in cattails by male. See
below.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
preponderate - only one substance will
be found the most
venturesome birds - refers to Marsh
Wrens that will venture into the water to find nesting
material; Marsh Wrens are not water birds
rankly -
Moses Lake is in eastern Washington.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Nesting: Dawson and Bowles (1909) give
a very good description of the nest of this wren as
follows:
The Marsh Wren's nest is a compact
ball of vegetable materials, lashed midway of cat-tails or
bull rushes, living or dead, and having a neat entrance hole
on one side. A considerable variety of materials is used in
construction, but in any given nest only one textile
substance will preponderate. Dead cat-tail leaves may be
employed, in which case the numerous loopholes will be
filled with matted down from the same plant. Fine dry
grasses may be utilized, and these so closely woven as
practically to exclude the rain. On Moses Lake, where rankly
growing bull rushes predominate in the nesting areas,
spirogyra is the material most largely used. This, the
familiar, scum-like plant which masses under water in quiet
places, is plucked out by the venturesome birds in great wet
banks and plastered about the nest until the required
thickness is attained. While wet, the substance matches its
surroundings admirably, but as it dries out it shrinks
considerably and fades to a sickly light green, or greenish
gray, which advertises itself among the obstinately green
bull rushes. Where this fashion prevails, one finds it
possible to pick out immediately the oldest member of the
group, and it is more than likely to prove the occupied
nest.
The nest-linings are of the softest
cat-tail down, feathers of wild fowl, or dried spirogyra
teased to a point of enduring fluffiness. It appears, also,
that the Wrens often cover their eggs upon leaving the nest.
Thus, in one we found on the 17th of May, which contained
seven eggs, the eggs were completely buried under a loose
blanket of soft vegetable fibers. The nest was by no means
deserted, for the eggs were warm and the mother bird very
solicitous, in so much that she repeatedly ventured within a
foot of my hand while I was engaged with the
nest.
|
Name |
|
Food |
Insects |
Feeding
Techniques |
From Bent: No very extensive study of the food of the short-billed marsh wren seems to have been made. Dr. Walkinshaw (1935) says that the food consists of insects. 'They have been observed to feed the young with moths, spiders, mosquitoes, flies, grasshoppers and bugs.' |
Habitat |
Grasslands, especially wet grass with bushes |
Plumage |
|
Distribution |
Eastern US |
Breeding |
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent |
During the time this account was written the Sedge Wren was known as the Short-billed Marsh Wren. |
Notes from A.C.
Bent |
Habits
This tiny wren is more of a meadow wren than a marsh wren, for it shuns the westtest marshes where the long-billed marsh wren loves to dwell among the tall, dense growths of cattails or bulrushes and where the water is a foot or more deep. It prefers the drier marshes or wet meadows, where there is little water or where the ground is merely damp. These are what we call the sedge meadows, where the principal growth consists of various species of Carex and tall grasses, often growing in thick tufts, and various other plants that need a little moisture. Such marshes are often intersected by streams or ditches or are bordered by lower and wetter marshes where cattails and bulrushes flourish in the deeper water; the short-billed marsh wrens have often been seen among the cattails and have even been known to build their nests low down in these flags, but they much prefer to breed in the sedge and grass association. A large marsh of the latter type, near my home, has been a favorite breeding ground for these wrens for many years; there are some small willows, alders and gray birches along the banks of the intersecting ditches; and small bushes scattered through the marsh serve as singing stations for the wrens; many flowering plants add color to the scene all through summer, and it is a glorious sight early in fall when the bur-marigold carpets the whole meadow with a blaze of yellow. A pair of marsh hawks may be seen here in spring performing their courtships; we have often seen the male in his spectacular flight and have flushed the female from here nest. This and other similar swamps in eastern Massachusetts are the favorite haunts of swamp sparrows, song Sparrows, Henslow's sparrows, and northern yellowthroats. |
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Swims underwater in fast moving
streams, rivers, to catch aquatic insects
|
|
Habitat
|
Mountain Streams
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Western US
|
|
Breeding
|
Usually builds nest that is protected
by falling water.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Water ouzel is an earlier name for the
American Dipper.
John Muir (1838 - 1914) American
naturalist and writer, and one of the people most
responsible for preserving Yosemite as a national park.
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
No better account of the American
dipper has ever been written than John Muir's (1894) chapter
on the water ouzel; I cannot do better than to quote freely
from it, as it covers the ground most beautifully. Of its
characteristic haunts, he writes: Among all the countless
waterfalls I have met in the course of ten years'
exploration in the Sierra, whether among the icy peaks, or
warm foot-hills, or in the profound Yosemite canyons of the
middle region, not one was found without its Ouzel. No
canyon is too cold for this little bird, none too lonely,
provided it be rich in falling water. Find a fall, or
cascade, or rushing rapid, anywhere upon a clear stream, and
there you will surely find its complementary Ouzel, flitting
about in the spray, diving in foaming eddies, whirling like
a leaf among beaten foam-bells; ever vigorous and
enthusiastic, yet self-contained, and neither seeking nor
shunning your company. * * * He is the mountain streams' own
darling, the hummingbird of blooming waters, loving rocky
ripple-slopes and sheets of foam as a bee loves flowers, as
a lark loves sunshine and meadows.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Arthropods
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Foraging; hover-glean
foraging
|
|
Habitat
|
Wooded areas
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have similar plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
John
Burroughs (1837 - 1921) a
contemporary of John Muir
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Courtship: This seems to consist
mainly of the display between rival males of the flaming red
crest, which is usually partially concealed or at least
restricted by the surrounding dull feathers of the crown,
but which can be uncovered or perhaps erected in the ardor
of courtship or in the anger of combat. John Burroughs (Far
and Near, pp. 178 -179) thus describes such rivalry between
two males: "They behaved exactly as if they were comparing
crowns, and each extolling his own. Their heads were bent
forward, the red crown patch uncovered end showing as a
large, brilliant cap, their tails spread out, and the side
feathers below the wings were fluffed out. They did not come
to blows, but followed each other about amid the branches,
uttering their thin, shrill notes, and displaying their ruby
crowns to the utmost."
It would not be surprising if rivalry
in song were also one of the features in the contest for
supremacy.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Arthropods
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Foraging; hover-glean
foraging
|
|
Habitat
|
Coniferous forests
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have similar plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Throughout the US
|
|
Breeding
|
Nest is placed in fir tree
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
Gold-crest is an old name for the
Golden-crowned Kinglet
From the account below is this
description of hover gleaning: "When they had cleared the
branches the little birds fluttered about the trunks,
hanging poised on busy wing, like hummingbirds before a
flower, meanwhile rapidly pecking the clinging eggs from the
bark."
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Edward
H. Forbush (1907) writes: "At
Wareham, on Dec. 25, 1905, I watched the Gold-crest hunting
its insect food amid the pines. The birds were fluttering
about among the trees. Each one would hover for a moment
before a tuft of pine 'needles,' and then either alight upon
it and feed, or pass on to another. I examined the 'needles'
after the kinglets had left them, and could find nothing on
them; but when a bird was disturbed before it had finished
feeding, the spray from which it had been driven was
invariably found to be infested with numerous black specks,
the eggs of plant lice.
Evidently the birds were cleaning each
spray thoroughly, as far as they went." Again, he saw
kinglets feeding in the pines near his home, mainly on the
trunks and the larger branches; they were feeding on the
eggs of the aphids,
which "were deposited in masses on the bark of the pines
from a point near the ground up to a height of thirty-five
feet. The trees must have been infested with countless
thousands of these eggs, for the band of Kinglets remained
there until March 25, almost three months later, apparently
feeding most of the time on these eggs. When they had
cleared the branches the little birds fluttered about the
trunks, hanging poised on busy wing, like hummingbirds
before a flower, meanwhile rapidly pecking the clinging eggs
from the bark."
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
Forages in trees
|
|
Habitat
|
Riparian woodlands, oaks
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Eastern US, and southwest
US
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
In defense of its nest, the
gnatcatcher's small size places it at a disadvantage in
competition with larger species, for it seems not to possess
the "driving power" of the even smaller hummingbirds, though
it lacks nothing in either bravery or initiative when
occasion demands. Its attitude toward human invasion of the
sacred precinct of the nest shows wide individual variation.
On the few occasions when I have approached closely to a
gnatcatcher's nest, my presence always caused great
excitement, which was evidenced by noisy protests but never
resulted in a direct attack. S. A. Grimes (1928) found the
brooding gnatcatcher very tame, and on several occasions he
"climbed to within five or six feet of a sitting bird
without causing it to leave the nest, or when it did it
usually returned before I could get the camera set up for
photographing." In sharp contrast to this, the same writer
(1932) described an attack made upon him while he was
photographing a nest, when the male gnatcatcher actually
"struck the writer several times on the head and once in the
eye," this last blow incapacitating him completely for a
time. Maurice Brooks (1933) tamed a pair of gnatcatchers by
making gradual advances toward the nest during the period of
incubation until, after the young had hatched, he and his
family could come within 2 or 3 feet of the nest without
interrupting the feeding schedule. Finally he cut off the
nest branch and lowered it for easier observation, still
without apparently disturbing the parent birds. His next
move was to cup his hands loosely about the nest in an
attempt to compel the parent birds to alight on the hands.
This intimacy was more than the birds would stand and the
result was surprising as the female immediately attacked
viciously and repeatedly. Amicable relations were later
re-established, and the female did occasionally actually
alight upon the experimenter's hands, but even then she
would without warning "sometimes take time out to attack."
All attacks were made by the female.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
Insects,
spiders
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
foraging
|
|
Habitat
|
Desert
|
|
Plumage
|
Male
and female have the same plumage
|
|
Distribution
|
Extreme southwest California, Arizona,
New Mexico, Texas
|
|
Breeding
|
Nest placed in shrub or tree. See
below.
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
plumbeous gnatcatcher
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
Nesting: The nests of the plumbeous
gnatcatcher are placed in low trees or small bushes at no
great height from the ground, much like those of the
black-tailed gnatcatcher. There are two nests of the former
in the Thayer collection in Cambridge, quite similar in
construction, but very different in dimensions. One taken by
W. W. Brown in Sonora on April 30, 1905, measures 1 1/4
inches in height, 2 inches in outer diameter, 1 inch inside
diameter, and 1 inch in inner depth; it was in a mesquite.
The other, a much larger nest, was taken from an Atriplez
bush on the desert near Phoenix, Ariz., by G. F. Brenninger
on April 10,1901; it measures 21/2 inches in height, 21/4 in
outside and 11/2 in inside diameter, and was hollowed to a
depth of 11/2 inches. Both nests are very neatly made of
various grayish fibers, compactly woven, and are lined with
pappus and other plant down; they are firmly bound with
spider web, but no lichens have been used for outside
decoration. Each nest held five eggs.
A nest taken by Frank C. Willard near
Tombstone, Ariz., on April 22, 1897, is described in his
notes as 31/2 feet up in a small bush, in a fork and
supported by various twigs; it was made of fine bark strips
and grass and was lined with fine grass and cactus fiber,
with a few small feathers woven in. A nest found by Van Tyne
and Sutton (1937) in Brewster County, Tex., on April 14,
1935, was "situated about three feet from the ground in a
thickly-leaved thorn bush that was growing under a huge
cottonwood." Mrs. Bailey (1928) mentions a nest near
Terlingua, Tex., in a fouquieria
(ocotillo) bush.
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Food
|
|
|
Feeding
Techniques
|
|
|
Habitat
|
|
|
Plumage
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Breeding
|
|
|
About the Notes
from A.C. Bent
|
|
|
Notes from A.C.
Bent
|
|