By Thomas C. Grubb, Jr. , Department of Zoology, Ohio State University
The Boxwood Press; Pacific Grove; 1986
(Used with Permission)
Preface
One of the most influential field
studies of birds ever performed was conducted just north of
my university here in Columbus. While carrying on her duties
as wife, mother and homemaker, Mrs. Margaret Morse Nice
devoted many hours to studying the behavior and ecology of
Song
Sparrows. Mrs. Nice's account
of her work is generally regarded as one of the finer
examples of descriptive ornithology ever produced in North
America by anyone, amateur or professional. At the time of Mrs. Nice's study,
amateurs were routinely making important contributions to
ornithology. General conclusions they reached from their
field work were useful additions to the body of knowledge
about birds, However, from the 1950s on, as the study of
avian biology became more analytical and less descriptive,
contributions by amateurs became less pivotal to the
discipline. One of the functions of this book is to bring
the techniques of analytical ornithology to the amateur
student of birds. Descriptive ornithology, which Mrs.
Nice accomplished so beautifully, requires careful
observation and note-taking on the behavior of birds in
their natural environment. The next step is to look for
generalities, common attributes about the events seen. For
example, after a number of years of watching the Song
Sparrows she had color-banded, Mrs. Nice could generalize
that in Columbus, Ohio, only males of the species stayed on
the breeding ground all winter. Very often, the final step in
descriptive ornithology is to create some explanation, or
hypothesis, for why the generality discovered should exist.
To continue with the Song Sparrow example, we might suggest
that males wintering in the breeding area are more likely to
secure a breeding territory during the following spring. The
processes of natural selection, therefore, should favor male
Song Sparrows wintering in Columbus because those birds
would produce more offspring during their lifetimes than
would male Song Sparrows that went south for the winter.
Increased reproductive success the following spring, then,
is a hypothesis for what causes some males to overwinter at
the northern breeding site. Although there are a few exceptions,
it seems fair to say that most amateur ornithologists have
not progressed beyond the descriptive stage of the science
to the next stage, which is analytical ornithology. At the
core of analytical ornithology is a method for evaluating
hypotheses. In particular, analytical ornithology provides a
method for concluding when a hypothesis is wrong, when an
explanation of cause and effect is a mistake. In our Song
Sparrow example, the methods of analytical ornithology would
give us a way of concluding whether we should believe that
males stay north because they have a better chance of
subsequently securing a breeding territory the next spring.
It is this ability to detect incorrect hypotheses that makes
analytical ornithology such an advance over the descriptive
study of birds. This book presents the concepts and
methods of analytical ornithology by analyzing a series of
hypotheses: Northern Orioles prefer to build their nests
over water; the size of a woodlot determines how many
species of birds live there; White-breasted Nuthatches cache
food during the fall in the same part of a woodland where
they will be foraging during the winter, and so forth. After
the reader works through several of the chapters, he or she
should be able to appreciate the steps involved in analyzing
hypotheses and should grasp the general concepts of
determining when a hypothesis is wrong. With the idea of making the practice
of analytical ornithology attractive and accessible, I have
organized this book into four major sections. Chapter 1
takes a detailed look at how analytical procedures can be
applied to the field study of birds. Chapter 2 examines in
greater depth the concepts and principles of analytical
science. The remaining chapters suggest how to go about
analyzing hypotheses about where birds live, how they
coexist, and why they make the decisions they do. Most
chapters conclude with a few sources of further reading
taken from North American ornithological journals. The last
major section of the book, Appendices 1 and 2, contains
methods for performing certain elementary statistical tests
of hypotheses. As explained further in Chapter 2, knowledge
of how likely an outcome is due to chance is very important
in determining the probability that a finding is due to
chance. As an option, a statistical test can be used in
conjunction with the results obtained in every project. At
the end of each chapter, the appropriate statistical
analysis is outlined. None of the projects outlined requires
extensive travel, and many can be taken up whenever a few
minutes or hours become available. The ability to recognize
individual birds in to a prerequisite for any project. In
any case, capturing and marking birds in any way is illegal
without federal and state permits. Equipment needs have been
kept to a minimum. Many projects require only a pencil, a
notebook, binoculars, and watch. In a few cases, some
simple, homemade devices are needed. This book is intended for several
audiences. First, it is designed for amateur birders, some
of whom may now be involved in descriptive ornithological
endeavors, such as Christmas Counts and Breeding Bird
Surveys. This group of "non-traditional students" includes
some of the very keenest observers of free-ranging birds,
and their observations can be invaluable in amassing the
facts from which hypotheses can be formulated. Yet amateurs
have rarely combined descriptive and analytical ornithology.
This book will have served its purpose if its broadens the
perspective of the amateur concerning the various ways that
the science of ornithology can be pursued. The second major audience is the high
school biology and science student. Aside from being
intrinsically interesting and "low-cost" subjects for class
projects or independent study, the exercises to follow could
serve as models for how any kind of analytical science is
performed, and what its capabilities and limitations are.
The third major intended audience is
the students taking college-level courses in ornithology,
animal behavior, and/or ecology. The analytically oriented
projects should be useful adjuncts to many lecture topics in
these disciplines of biology. Many of these field projects
can be pursued during the fall, winter, and early spring
when colleges are in session.